Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul 24;16(11):3355–3371. doi: 10.7150/jca.115374

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Expression and influence of CDKN2A in cuproptosis of OV. (A) Expression levels of group was imaged at 0 and 12 hours using a microscope. (K) The recover areas were calculated by ImageJ software in different groups at different time point. (L) Cell migration assay results of ES-2 cells in the control group and CuET treated group (0.5 μg/mL). (M) Calculate the degree of cell migration in the control group and CuET treated group (0.5 μg/mL) using ImageJ software. (N, O) Tumor size (N) and volume (O) measurements in the CDX model following CuET treatment (5mg/kg and 15mg/kg). (P) Body weights of mice across different treatment groups. n = 3, independent experiments (D, E, F, G, H, K, L and M). Data presented as mean ± S.D. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's unpaired t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, **p < 0.001.