Table 3.

DCMD performances against SDS containing-saline feed of fabricated composite electrospun nanofibrous membrane in this work and in other literature.

Membrane	FD, nm	P, %	PSave, μm	WCA, °	LEP, kPa	Feed composition	ΔT, °C	Flux, LMH	Test duration, h	Reference
PET/CA/SiO2/FAS	331	78.4	0.35	156	-	3.5 wt% NaCl with 0.2 mM SDS	33	13	120	49
PVDF-HFP/reduced graphene oxide/FAS	184	-	-	153.8	122.7	3.5 wt% NaCl with 0.3 mM SDS	50	28	25	31
PVDF/Teflon AF2400	-	80.8	-	148	70	0.6 M NaCl with 0.4 mM SDS	50	27	90	41
PTFE/PVA/PAN/FAS	-	64	-	167	220	3.5 wt% NaCl with 0.1 mM SDS	60 °C feed, 0.03 MPaa	6.91	24	50
PVDF-HFP/FAS/SiO2	197.2	-	0.42	~ 150	-	1 M NaCl with 0.3 mM SDS	40	~ 15	8	6
PVDF-HFP/FAS	133	78	0.55	154.1	225	3.5 wt % NaCl + 0.4 mM SDS	50	10.5	8	51
PVDF/FAS/PDA	309	89	0.36	170	216	3.5 wt % NaCl + 0.5 mM SDS	40	17	6	52
PVDF/FAS/TiO2 (electrospin + electrospray)	176	82	0.96	139	194	3.5 wt % NaCl + 0.1 mM SDS	45	14.8	24	This work

^avacuum MD. FD – Fiber diameter, P – Porosity, PS_ave – Average pore size, WCA – Water contact angle, LEP – Liquid entry pressure.