Skip to main content
. 2002 Mar;68(3):1265–1279. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.3.1265-1279.2002

TABLE 2.

LIBSHUFF comparisons of isolate and clone libraries

Comparison no. Homologous (X) coverage data
Heterologous (Y) coverage data
Library Sample yr n Library P
1 Soil clones 1999 95 Cast clones 0.001
Cast clones 1999 102 Soil clones 0.431
2 Soil clone subseta 1999 76 Cast clone subseta 0.144
Cast clone subseta 1999 51 Soil clone subseta 0.421
3 Soil clones 1999 95 Soil isolates 0.001
Soil isolates 1996 99 Soil clones 0.001
4 Cast clones 1999 102 Cast isolates 0.042
Cast isolates 1997 74 Cast clones 0.001
5 Soil isolates 1996 99 Burrow isolates 0.192
Burrow isolates 1996 31 Soil isolates 0.551
6 Soil isolates 1996 99 Cast isolates 0.001
Cast isolates 1997 74 Soil isolates 0.001
7 Soil isolates 1996 99 Cast isolate subsetb 0.001
Cast isolate subsetb 1997 53 Soil isolates 0.005
a

Does not contain clones within Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, γ-Proteobacteria, and undescribed group A.

b

Does not contain isolates belonging to the Aeromonas lineage.