Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 23;15:30997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16142-x

Table 10.

Performance comparison with different patch sizes.

Patch size Training loss Training Acc Validation loss Validation Acc
Apple dataset41
 2 0.3741 0.9912 0.3302 0.9874
 4 0.3828 0.9914 0.3722 0.9914
 8 0.3728 0.9972 0.3732 0.9923
 16 0.3875 0.9905 0.3826 0.9841
Rice dataset34
 2 0.3354 0.9942 0.3671 0.9901
 4 0.3249 1.0000 0.3521 0.9942
 8 0.3228 1.0000 0.3528 0.9970
 16 0.3485 0.9912 0.3662 0.9897
Ibean dataset36
 2 0.3334 0.9843 0.4264 0.9579
 4 0.3157 0.9904 0.4178 0.9617
 8 0.3028 0.9965 0.4028 0.9702
 16 0.3394 0.9808 0.4349 0.9496
Cassava dataset42
 2 0.4417 0.8846 0.6579 0.7319
 4 0.4259 0.9155 0.6297 0.7552
 8 0.4228 0.9247 0.6328 0.7651
 16 0.4491 0.8808 0.6592 0.7296
PlantVillage dataset14
 2 0.1507 0.9904 0.2142 0.9902
 4 0.1358 0.9947 0.1857 0.9926
 8 0.1347 0.9973 0.1836 0.9941
 16 0.2268 0.9923 0.1926 0.9917