Table 1.
Advantages/Potentials and Disadvantages/Pitfalls of AI and LLMs in Managing Superficial Fungal Infections
| Potentials | Pitfalls |
|---|---|
| Pathology Settings | Model Accuracy |
| Increased throughput of samples | Can be prone to hallucinations/confabulations |
| AI assisted analysis of samples | Quality of training data can impact accuracy |
| Report generation in genetic testing for species identification and detection of resistance mutations | Falsehood mimicry due to accepting false information from user as fact |
| Algorithmic errors | |
| Patient Screening | User experience in prompting |
| Differentiate infectious vs non-infectious conditions | Potential for patient harm |
| Reduce need for unnecessary testing | Stale-dating of training data |
| Reduce the need for unnecessary antifungal prescriptions | Data bias |
| Promote anti-microbial stewardship | |
| Regulatory and Ethical Concerns | |
| Breach of patient privacy | |
| Unauthorized use of patient information | |
| Regulatory status and implications | |
| Access to Dermatological Care | Process transparency |
| Consultation tool to assist non-dermatologists in providing care | |
| Formation of treatment plans personalized to each patient | Legal Concerns |
| Who is responsible party in event of medical error | |
| Access Concerns | |
| Cost of specialized hardware | |
| Cost of running the model | |
| Availability of sufficient infrastructure | |
| Adequate training for users |