Table 1.

Effects of the light type (darkness, HPS, and LED) and predation cue (present/absent) on food consumption (A–C) and movement (D and E) of amphipods

	Response variable	Effect	df	MS	F	P a
A	Consumption probabilityb	Predation cue	1, 89		0.901	0.345
		Light type	2, 89		2.516	0.087
		Cue × light	2, 89		5.854	0.004*
		Size ratioe	1, 89		0.359	0.551
B	Attack initiation timec	Predation cue	1, 86	0.14	0.05	0.817
		Light type	2, 86	0.35	0.13	0.877
		Cue × light	2, 86	3.40	1.27	0.285
		Size ratioe	1, 86	11.69	4.38	0.039*
C	Handling timec	Predation cue	1, 86	0.01	0.06	0.801
		Light type	2, 86	1.71	9.85	<0.001*
		Cue × light	2, 86	1.16	6.66	0.002*
		Size ratioe	1, 86	0.01	0.03	0.858
D	Movement timed	Predation cue	1, 89	25.63	0.10	0.751
		Light type	2, 89	4523.66	17.95	<0.001*
		Cue × Light	2, 89	1053.14	4.18	0.018*
E	Time in shelterd	Predation cue	1, 89	5402.35	11.97	<0.001*
		Light type	2, 89	2989.39	6.62	0.002*
		Cue × light	2, 89	2354.32	5.21	0.007*

^aSignificant effects indicated with asterisks.

^bGeneralized linear model, binomial distribution, and logit link function.

^cGeneral linear model and data log-transformed.

^dGeneral linear model and no data transformation.

^eCovariate in the model.