Table 2.
Effect of body size and temperature on the acoustic parameters of the advertisement call of Boulenophrys ombrophila based on LMMs
| Call parameter | Predictor | Estimate | χ2 | P | R 2 conditional | R 2 marginal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Call duration | Body size | −441.692 | 0.721 | 0.396 | 0.122 | 0.007 |
| Temperature | 1.658 | 4.058 | 0.044 | 0.118 | 0.031 | |
| Call interval | Body size | 1,391.644 | 0.125 | 0.723 | 0.076 | 0.001 |
| Temperature | 0.047 | <0.001 | 0.995 | 0.076 | <0.001 | |
| Dominant frequency | Body size | −17,902.380 | 1.264 | 0.261 | 0.425 | 0.040 |
| Temperature | 43.117 | 2.474 | 0.116 | 0.423 | 0.074 | |
| Pulse number | Body size | −21.986 | 0.014 | 0.906 | 0.383 | <0.001 |
| Temperature | −0.093 | 0.076 | 0.783 | 0.383 | 0.002 | |
| Call rate | Body size | −6.659 | 0.018 | 0.893 | 0.617 | 0.001 |
| Temperature | −0.038 | 0.180 | 0.671 | 0.616 | 0.010 | |
| Call number | Body size | −1,784.174 | 0.861 | 0.354 | 0.368 | 0.034 |
| Temperature | 2.761 | 0.614 | 0.433 | 0.370 | 0.025 |
Numbers in bold indicate significant correlations between variables (P < 0.05).