Table 2.
Mixed effects logistic regression models estimating emotional support among caregivers (n = 776 NM ties nested within 71 participants across 30 families)
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3a | Model 3b | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictors | OR | CI | OR | CI | OR | CI | OR | CI |
| Intercept | 0.41 | 0.08 – 2.01 | 0.34 | 0.07 – 1.66 | 0.39 | 0.06 – 2.43 | 1.56 | 0.22 – 11.29 |
| Uplift | 2.19 ** | 1.24 – 3.87 | 2.57 ** | 1.43 – 4.61 | 2.58 ** | 1.44 – 4.62 | 0.62 | 0.25 – 1.52 |
| Malfeasance | 0.86 | 0.47 – 1.57 | 0.90 | 0.49 – 1.64 | 0.90 | 0.49 – 1.64 | 0.53 | 0.20 – 1.36 |
| Nonfeasance | 0.35 *** | 0.20 – 0.61 | 0.40 ** | 0.23 – 0.70 | 0.40 ** | 0.23 – 0.70 | 0.44 * | 0.19 – 0.98 |
| Kinship (Friendship) | 2.28 ** | 1.38 – 3.78 | 2.28 ** | 1.37 – 3.78 | 0.92 | 0.45 – 1.90 | ||
| AD FH | 0.85 | 0.29 – 2.53 | 0.06 *** | 0.01 – 0.31 | ||||
| x Uplift | 13.56 *** | 3.87 – 47.57 | ||||||
| x Malfeasance | 2.57 | 0.75 – 8.84 | ||||||
| x Nonfeasance | 0.86 | 0.28 – 2.69 | ||||||
| x Kinship (Friendship) | 6.52 *** | 2.26 – 18.77 | ||||||
| NM Gender (male) | 0.91 | 0.58 – 1.43 | 0.86 | 0.54 – 1.35 | 0.86 | 0.54 – 1.35 | 0.78 | 0.49 – 1.25 |
| Gender homophily | 1.30 | 0.82 – 2.05 | 1.12 | 0.71 – 1.79 | 1.12 | 0.71 – 1.79 | 1.11 | 0.69 – 1.78 |
| Care needs | 1.01 | 0.94 – 1.08 | 1.00 | 0.94 – 1.07 | 1.00 | 0.93 – 1.07 | 1.00 | 0.93 – 1.08 |
| Random Effects (Variance [standard deviation]) | ||||||||
| Participant τ00 | 3.36 (1.83) | 3.26 (1.81) | 3.29 (1.81) | 3.20 (1.79) | ||||
| Family τ00 | 0.44 (0.66) | 0.44 (0.67) | 0.40 (0.64) | 0.55 (0.74) | ||||
| Marginal R2 / Conditional R2 | 0.044 / 0.557 | 0.060 / 0.558 | 0.060 / 0.557 | 0.108 / 0.583 | ||||
Notes. AD FH = Family history of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia; NM = Network member.
p<0.05
p<0.01
p<0.001