Table 4.

Logistic regression between the set outcome and performance indicators—Model 1.

Set outcomea	β	SE	Odds ratio	Sig.
Performance indicatorb
PC serve	—	—	—	0.007*
Medium	1.822	0.651	6.186	0.005*
High	1.159	0.574	3.186	0.044
PC set	—	—	—	0.043*
Medium	0.236	0.805	1.267	0.769
High	1.408	0.700	4.088	0.044*
PC block	—	—	—	0.003*
Medium	0.840	0.515	2.316	0.103
High	2.710	0.804	15.033	<0.001*
PC dig	—	—	—	0.006*
Medium	1.646	0.565	5.187	0.004*
High	2.625	1.046	13.811	0.012*
EFF attack	—	—	—	<0.001*
Medium	1.216	0.717	3.375	0.090
High	3.266	0.810	26.207	<0.001*
EFF counterattack	—	—	—	<0.001*
Medium	1.721	0.744	5.590	0.021*
High	2.917	0.809	18.490	<0.001*

PC, performance coefficient; EFF, efficiency; CA, counterattack.

Hosmer–Lemeshow test: p = 0.684; r² = 0.605; VIF^mean = 1.07 (±0.06); tolerance: 0.93 (±0.05); model's accuracy = 82.91%.

^a Winner was used as the reference category.

^b Low was used as the reference category.

^*p ≤ 0.05.