Table 5.

Logistic regression between the set outcome and performance indicators—Model 2.

Set outcomea	β	SE	Odds ratio	Sig.
Performance indicatorb
K0	—	—	—	0.039*
Medium	1.205	0.724	3.336	0.096
High	1.932	0.774	6.907	0.013*
K2	—	—	—	<0.001
Medium	1.328	0.763	3.772	0.082
High	6.405	1.363	604.904	<0.001*
K3B	—	—	—	<0.001*
Medium	1.149	0.682	3.155	0.092
High	5.201	1.240	181.371	0.000*
PC Set	—	—	—	0.061
Medium	1.366	1.152	3.919	0.236
High	2.377	1.084	10.771	0.028*
PC attack (medium + high)	2.256	1.188	9.544	0.058
EFF attack	—	—	—	0.016*
Medium	−0.968	1.172	0.380	0.409
High	1.195	1.410	3.304	0.397
Constant	−7.188	1.648	0.001	<0.001

PC, performance coefficient; EFF, efficiency.

Hosmer–Lemeshow test: p = 0.735; r² = 0.789; VIF^mean = 1.54 (±0.65); tolerance: 0.73 (±0.27); model's accuracy = 90.50%.

^a Winner was used as the reference category.

^b Low was used as the reference category.

^*p ≤ 0.05.