Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 25;25:346. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01884-x

Table 3.

Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of mp-PI-RADS, bp-PI-RADS and S-PI-RADS at different PSA levels

Variables cut-off SEN, % SPE, % ACC, % PPV, % NPV, % F1-score AUC P value*
Overall PSA level
 mp-PI-RADS 4 80.1 85.4 83.1 81.1 84.7 0.806 (0.752–0.860)

0.889

(0.863–0.914)

0.285a
 bp-PI-RADS 4 77.9 84.8 81.8 80.0 83.1 0.789 (0.734–0.844)

0.882

(0.856–0.908)

0.072b
 S-PI-RADS 3b 88.8 75.5 81.3 73.8 89.7 0.806 (0.752–0.860)

0.853

(0.824–0.882)

0.018c
PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml
 mp-PI-RADS 4 70.8 91.0 85.7 73.0 90.0 0.719 (0.642–0.796)

0.882

(0.836–0.928)

0.306a
 bp-PI-RADS 3 93.8 64.4 71.9 47.7 96.8 0.632 (0.548–0.716)

0.867

(0.819–0.914)

0.129b
 S-PI-RADS 3b 80.0 75.0 76.3 52.5 91.6 0.634 (0.552–0.716)

0.818

(0.764–0.872)

0.021c
PSA > 10 ng/ml
 mp-PI-RADS 4 83.2 78.7 81.2 83.6 78.2 0.832 (0.778–0.886)

0.874

(0.837–0.910)

1.000a
 bp-PI-RADS 4 81.2 81.3 81.2 85.0 76.8 0.831 (0.777–0.885)

0.872

(0.836–0.909)

1.000b
 S-PI-RADS 3b 91.6 76.1 84.9 83.3 87.4 0.873 (0.822–0.924)

0.866

(0.827–0.904)

1.000c

SEN sensitivity, SPE specificity, ACC accuracy, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, AUC areas under the curve

*, The differences in AUCs among the bp-PI-RADS, S-PI-RADS and mp-PI-RADS were compared using the Delong test; a mp-PI-RADS vs. bp-PI-RADS, b bp-PI-RADS vs. S-PI-RADS, c mp-PI-RADS vs. S-PI-RADS. P-values were adjusted using the Bomferroni correction