Skip to main content
. 2025 Feb 18;156(3):349–361. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012022

Table 2.

Comparison of Displeasing Results between SEG and DRG Groups

Primary (n = 184) Secondary (n = 245) Adjusted Pb
SEG (%) DRG (%) P a SEG (%) DRG (%) P a
No. 139 45 148 97
Witch’s nose 0 (0) 0 (0) 1.000 1 (0.68) 0 (0) 1.000 0.676
Tip-columellar deviation 9 (6.48) 1 (2.22) 0.455 6 (4.05) 1 (1.03) 0.249 0.118
Tip drooping 9 (6.48) 7 (15.56) 0.072 4 (2.70) 5 (5.16) 0.325 0.040
Mild relapse of shortened tip 8 (5.76) 2 (4.44) 1.000 2 (1.35) 2 (2.06) 0.649 0.929
Protrusion of caudal end of graft 1 (0.72) 0 (0) 1.000 0 (0) 0 (0) 1.000 0.939
Pinched tip 0 (0) 0 (0) 1.000 2 (1.35) 0 (0) 0.520 0.426
Supratip deformity 0 (0) 1 (2.22) 0.245 0 (0) 3 (3.09) 0.061 0.010
Nasal obstruction 2 (1.44) 0 (0) 1.000 2 (1.35) 0 (0) 0.520 0.297
Saddle nose deformity 1 (0.72) 0 (0) 1.000 0 (0) 0 (0) 1.000 0.939
a

Fisher exact tests, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

b

Logistic regression tests, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Adjustments were conducted using the Firth logistic regression for surgical history (primary or secondary).