Table 2.
Exercise/Stretching/Relaxation/Biofeedback therapy for dystonia.
| Exercise/Stretching/Relaxation/Biofeedback (n = 33) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Study design | Participant characteristics | Intervention | Assessment outcomes | Results | AAN class | ||||
| Active group | Control group | Active | Control | |||||||
| Focal Cervical Dystonia | ||||||||||
| Useros-Olmo et al., 202056 Spain | Case-control | N | 15 | 12 | Treatment | Relaxation technique programs | Observation | SF-36, VAS, TWSTRS (subjective, pain, severity) | Significant improvements in all outcomes | III |
| M/F | 1/14 | 4/8 | Details | Aquatic Watsu therapy, autogenic training | ||||||
| Age (y) | 47 ± 14 | 54 ± 12 | Frequency/Duration | Supervised: 1 session/w + Home: 30min/day, 4w | ||||||
| Boyce. et al., 201353 Australia | RCT | N | 9 | 11 | Treatment | Semi-supervised active exercise program | Relaxation | TWSTRS, BDI (severity, depression) | Both groups significantly improved dystonia severity & depression. No significant difference between groups | II |
| M/F | 6/14 | Details | Exercise to correct dystonic head position, relaxation | |||||||
| Age (y) | 57 ± 7 | Frequency/Duration | Supervised: 30 min session/w, 8w + Home: daily, 12w | |||||||
| Zetterberg. et al., 200852 Sweden | Pre-post | N | 6 | Treatment | Supervised PT | NA | TWSTRS, CDQ24, pain scale (severity, pain, subjective) | Significant improvement in all outcomes | III | |
| M/F | 2/4 | Details | Progressive muscle relaxation, isometric muscle endurance, dynamic strength | |||||||
| Age (y) | 48 (30–59) | Frequency/Duration | 45 min/session, 36 session, 4 w | |||||||
| Smania. et al., 200355 Italy | Cross-over | N | 4 | Treatment | Supervised PT | Standard biofeedback program | Head realignment, questionnaire, VAS (function, subjective, pain) | Both groups significantly improved pain & head-trunk alignment. No significant difference between groups | III | |
| M/F | 1/3 | Details | Postural reeducation exercises, passive elongation of myofascial cervical structures | |||||||
| Age (y) | 41.7 | Frequency/Duration | 1 hr/session, 5 d/w, 5 w | |||||||
| Duddy. et al., 199554 UK | RCT | N | 6 | 5 | Treatment | Biofeedback training | Television monitored relaxation only | EMG, speech evaluation (physiological study, subjective) | Both groups significantly improved subjective symptoms No significant difference between groups | II |
| M/F | 5/6 | Details | EMG biofeedback, television monitored relaxation | |||||||
| Age (y) | 33–66 | Frequency/Duration | 2 session/w, 4 w | |||||||
| Spencer. et al., 199151 USA | Case report | N | 1 | Treatment | Supervised PT | NA | Subjective, head posture, EMG (subjective, function, physiological study) | Improvement in ROM & head posture | IV | |
| M/F | M | Details | Strengthen antagonists, correction of head posture with mirror | |||||||
| Age (y) | 29 | Frequency/Duration | 7 sessions, 20 w | |||||||
| Leplow. et al., 199057 Germany | Pre-post | N | 10 | Treatment | Biofeedback training | NA | Subjective symptoms | Significant improvement | IV | |
| M/F | 6/4 | Details | EMG biofeedback, relaxation, stress-management, counselling | |||||||
| Age (y) | 42–61 | Frequency/Duration | 45 min/session, 14–25 sessions | |||||||
| Jahanshahi. et al., 199061 UK | RCT | N | 6 | 6 | Treatment | EMG biofeedback + relaxation | Relaxation | ROM, EMG (function, physiological study) | Both groups significantly improved in head position & neck mobility. | II |
| M/F | 3/3 | 2/4 | Details | Learning to relax tense sternocleidomastoid | ||||||
| Age (y) | 48 (26–68) | 57 (48–60) | Frequency/Duration | 1–2 session/w, 27 sessions, 3m | ||||||
| Cleeland. et al., 198358 USA | Pre-post | N | 10 | Treatment | Biofeedback training | NA | Overall Symptoms (subjective) | Improvement in 9/10 patients | IV | |
| M/F | 4/6 | Details | EMG biofeedback (auditory & electrical shock) | |||||||
| Age (y) | 15–64 | Frequency/Duration | 6–23 sessions | |||||||
| Martin. et al., 198159 UK | Case series | N | 6 | Treatment | Biofeedback training + Home training | NA | EMG, ROM (physiological study, function) | All patients improved to some extent | IV | |
| M/F | 0/6 | Details | Conventional 4 sessions + Specifically designed 4 sessions | |||||||
| Age (y) | 40–63 | Frequency/Duration | Biofeedback: 20 session/d, 3d + Home: daily, 1w | |||||||
| Brudny. et al., 197660 USA | Pre-post | N | 69 | Treatment | Biofeedback training | NA | Overall Symptoms (subjective) | Improvement in 37/69 patients | III | |
| M/F | NA | Details | EMG biofeedback | |||||||
| Age (y) | NA | Frequency/Duration | 3–5 sessions/w, 8–12w | |||||||
| Laryngeal Dystonia | ||||||||||
| Keatley. et al., 199462 UK | Case report | N | 1 | Treatment | Speech therapy | NA | Speech evaluation (subjective, performance) | Specifically designed showed greater improvement in subjective symptoms & speech performance | IV | |
| M/F | M | Details | Speech therapy specifically designed to reduce lip tension | |||||||
| Age (y) | 62 | Frequency/Duration | Conventional: 4 sessions + Specifically designed: 4 sessions | |||||||
| Focal Limb Dystonia | ||||||||||
| Ackermann. et al., 202174 Australia | Pre-post | Type | Musician’s dystonia | Treatment | Anatomy based retraining program | NA | Tubiana and Chamagne Scale (performance) | Improvement in music performance | IV | |
| N | 4 | Details | Progressive muscle activation, movement exercise program | |||||||
| M/F | 2/2 | Frequency/Duration | Every day, 12 m | |||||||
| Age (y) | 27.8 | |||||||||
| Butler. et al., 201867 UK | Pre-post | Type | Musician’s dystonia | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Sensorimotor rehab | NA | Arm dystonia disability (severity) | Slight improvement in dystonia severity | III |
| N | 7 | 5 | Details | mirror therapy, slow down exercise, ultrasound, re-education, exercise, stretch | ||||||
| M/F | 4/8 | Frequency/Duration | Supervised: 30–60 min/session, 6 sessions + Home: daily, 6m | |||||||
| Age (y) | 51 | |||||||||
| Yoshie. et al., 201573 Japan | Case report | Type | Musician’s dystonia | Treatment | Slow down exercise training | NA | Key stroke (performance) | Regularity of keystrokes improved | IV | |
| N | 1 | Details | Simple five-finger motor task | |||||||
| M/F | F | Frequency/Duration | 30 min/d, every day, 1y | |||||||
| Age (y) | 25 | |||||||||
| Hashimoto. et al., 201480 Japan | Case report | Type | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Brain-computer interface rehabilitation | NA | Handwriting test (performance) | Improvement in writing performance | IV | |
| N | 1 | Details | Visual EEG feedback from sensorimotor cortex | |||||||
| M/F | F | |||||||||
| Age (y) | 67 | Frequency/Duration | 60 min/session, 10 sessions, 5m | |||||||
| Cheng. et al., 201379 Germany | Case-control | Type | Musician’s dystonia | Healthy control | Treatment | Altered auditory feedback | No or delayed feedback | Key stroke (performance) | No significant improvement in both groups | III |
| N | 12 | 25 | Details | Input at tempo of 4 notes/min, 80 beats/min | ||||||
| M/F | 8/4 | 13/12 | Frequency/Duration | 1 min | ||||||
| Age (y) | 44 (9) | 25 (3) | ||||||||
| de Lisle. et al., 201272 New Zealand | Case report | Type | Musician’s dystonia | Treatment | Instrumental retraining | NA | Music performance scales (performance) | Improvement in music performance | IV | |
| N | 1 | Details | Upper limb reversing position | |||||||
| M/F | F | Frequency/Duration | 18 sessions, 5w | |||||||
| Age (y) | 42 | |||||||||
| Baur. et al., 200978 Germany | Pre-post | Type | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Biofeedback training | NA | Writing frequency, fluency, pressure (performance) | Significant improvement in writing performance | III | |
| N | 7 | Details | Auditory grip force feedback training, writing strategies | |||||||
| M/F | 3/4 | Frequency/Duration | 60 min/session, 7 sessions, 2–7w | |||||||
| Age (y) | 52 (44–65) | |||||||||
| Byl. et al., 200964 USA | Pre-post | Type | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Home-based sensorimotor training | NA | Task specific performance (performance) | Significant improvement in writing performance | III | |
| N | 13 | Details | Imagery of normal movement, learning to interface hand with target instrument, sensorimotor training | |||||||
| M/F | 10/3 | Frequency/Duration | 3 h/d, 5 d/w for 2w in Phase I; 5 h/d for 1w in Phase II; 8w | |||||||
| Age (y) | 47 (27–66) | |||||||||
| McKenzie. et al., 200966 USA | Pre-post | Type | Musician’s dystonia | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Learning based sensorimotor training | NA | Physical, sensory, & motor performance | Both groups significantly improved task specific performance | III |
| N | 14 | 13 | Details | Education on healthy habits, home program | ||||||
| M/F | 7/7 | 4/9 | Frequency/Duration | 2 h/d home training, 8w | ||||||
| Age (y) | 42 ± 11 | 44 ± 10 | ||||||||
| Berger. et al., 200775 Netherlands | Pre-post | Type | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Biofeedback training | NA | writing test | Significant improvement in handwriting | III | |
| N | 5 | Details | Muscle feedback recorded with EMG during writing | |||||||
| M/F | 5/0 | Frequency/Duration | 5–10 sessions, 5–14 m | |||||||
| Age (y) | 28–54 | |||||||||
| de Lisle. et al., 200671 New Zealand | Case series | Type | Musician’s dystonia | Treatment | Instrumental retraining | NA | Music performance scales (performance) | Improvement in music performance | IV | |
| N | 3 | Details | Motor practice with proper body biomechanics | |||||||
| M/F | NA | Frequency/Duration | 10 sessions, 2 w | |||||||
| Age (y) | NA | |||||||||
| Sakai. et al., 200670 Japan | Case series | Type | Musician’s dystonia | Treatment | Slow-down exercise | NA | Music performance scales (performance) | Improvement in music performance | IV | |
| N | 20 | Details | Practice playing piano at slowed speed | |||||||
| M/F | 10/10 | Frequency/Duration | 30min/day, daily, 1–6 y | |||||||
| Age (y) | 30 | |||||||||
| Schenk. et al., 200469 UK | Pre-post | Type | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Writing retraining | NA | Handwriting kinematics (performance) | Significant improvements | III | |
| N | 50 | Details | Supervised motor exercises | |||||||
| M/F | 21/29 | Frequency/Duration | 50–60 min/session, 1 session/1–4w, 2–20 sessions, 4 m | |||||||
| Age (y) | 44 ± 11 | |||||||||
| Byl. et al., 200363 USA | Pre-post | Type | Musician’s dystonia | Treatment | Sensory discrimination training | NA | Task specific performance (performance) | Significant improvement | III | |
| N | 3 | Details | Sensorimotor training, stress-free use for hand, aerobics, postural exercises | |||||||
| M/F | 1/2 | Frequency/Duration | Supervised: 19–23 sessions + Home: daily, 12 w | |||||||
| Age (y) | 23,35,24 | |||||||||
| Zeuner. et al., 200268 USA | Pre-post | Type | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Sensory training | NA | Fahn dystonia scale (severity) | Significant improvement in dystonia severity | III | |
| N | 10 | Details | Braille reading at grade 1 level | |||||||
| M/F | 1/9 | Frequency/Duration | 30–60 min/d, daily, 8 w | |||||||
| Age (y) | 50 ± 7 | |||||||||
| Byl. et al., 200065 USA | Case series | Type | Musician’s dystonia | Treatment | Sensory discriminative training + Home program | NA | Sensory Integration and Praxis Test; strength; ROM, VAS (severity, function, pain) | Significant improvements in all outcomes | IV | |
| N | 12 | Details | Posture, relaxation, mobilization, fitness, motor imagery | |||||||
| M/F | NA | Frequency/Duration | 6–18 w | |||||||
| Age (y) | NA | |||||||||
| Deepak. et al., 199977 India | Pre-post | Type | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Biofeedback training | NA | VAS, EMG (performance, pain, physiological study) | Writing performance and pain improved in 9/10 patients | IV | |
| N | 10 | Details | Audio-feedback EMG from abnormally activity muscles during writing practice | |||||||
| M/F | 10/0 | Frequency/Duration | 4 sessions minimum, 8 w | |||||||
| Age (y) | 19–62 | |||||||||
| O’Neill. et al., 199776 (USA) | Case report | Type | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Biofeedback training | NA | Self-report, EMG (subjective, physiological study) | Subjective improvement & decrease in EMG amplitude | IV | |
| N | 1 | Details | EMG biofeedback (visual+auditory) during handwriting practice | |||||||
| M/F | M | Frequency/Duration | Supervised: 2 sessions + Home: daily, 2w | |||||||
| Age (y) | 52 | |||||||||
| Functional Dystonia | ||||||||||
| Gros. et al., 202481 Canada | Pre-post | N | 4 | Treatment | PT | NA | Subjective symptoms (subjective) | All patients reported subjective improvement | IV | |
| M/F | 1/3 | Details | Symptom-based individualized rehabilitation | |||||||
| Age (y) | 22–32 | Frequency/Duration | 3m - 1y | |||||||
| Stephen. et al., 201782 USA | Case report | N | 1 | Treatment | PT | NA | Subjective symptoms (subjective) | No significant improvement | IV | |
| M/F | F | Details | NA | |||||||
| Age (y) | 41 | Frequency/Duration | NA | |||||||
Values are shown as mean (standard deviation or SD), if SD was not available in the article min - max were shown if possible. AAN class, American Academy of Neurology classification framework; number of patients, n; male, M; female, F; year, y; month, week, w; hour, h; minute, min; second, s; not applicable, NA; Randomized controlled trial, RCT; 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, SF-36; Visual Analogue Scale, VAS; Toronto Western spasmodic torticollis rating scale, TWSTRS; Physical therapy, PT; Beck Depression Inventory, BDI; Cervical Dystonia Questionnaire, CDQ; writer’s cramp rating scale, WCRS; single-photon emission computed tomography, SPECT; The Burke–Fahn–Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale, BFMDRS; Electromyography. EMG; Range of Motion, ROM; electroencephalogram, EEG.