Table 3.
Adaptive Aids or Devices (Kinesiotape, Splints, Vibrotactile stimulation, Orthotic device, TENS and FES)
| Adaptive Aids or (kinesiotapes, splints, orthotic devices, vibrotactile stimulators, TENs) (n = 24) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Study design | Participant characteristics | Intervention | Assessment outcomes | Results | AAN class | ||||
| Active group | Control group | Active | Control | |||||||
| Focal Cervical Dystonia | ||||||||||
| Xu. et al., 202484 USA | Pre-post | N | 44 | Treatment | Vibrotactile stimulation | NA | Perceived pain score (0–100 pain scale) | Significant improvement in pain | III | |
| M/F | 15/29 | Details | Small electric vibratory motors stimulated sternocleidomastoid ± trapezius muscles | |||||||
| Age (y) | 61.8 | Frequency/Duration | 45 min stimulation, single session | |||||||
| Pelosin et al., 201383 Italy | RCT cross-over | N | 12 | Treatment | Kinesiotaping | Sham taping | VAS, TWSTRS (pain, severity) | Significant improvement in pain No significant improvement in dystonia severity | II | |
| M/F | 4/8 | Details | Kinesiotape applied to skin over affected muscles | |||||||
| Age (y) | 55 ± 9 | Frequency/Duration | Taping every day, 2 w/condition, 1m/washout, 2m | |||||||
| Laryngeal dystonia | ||||||||||
| Khosravani. et al., 201985 USA | Pre-post | N | 13 | Type | Vibrotactile stimulation | NA | Voice analysis (performance) | 9 participants had less voice breaks & better voice quality | IV | |
| M/F | 5/8 | Details | vibro-motors attached to skin over thyroid cartilage were used during vocalization for laryngeal vibration | |||||||
| Age (y) | 58 ± 12 | Frequency/Duration | Single session for ~30min | |||||||
| Focal limb dystonia | ||||||||||
| Bravi. et al., 201986 Italy | Cross-over | Type | Musician’s dystonia | Treatment | Kinesiotaping | Sham Kinesiotaping | VAS (performance) | No significant improvement in music performance | III | |
| N | 7 | Details | Kinesiotape applied to skin over affected dystonic fingers as well as compensatory fingers | |||||||
| M/F | NA | |||||||||
| Age (y) | 35 ± 9 | Frequency/Duration | Single session lasting ~ 8 min | |||||||
| Oborzyński. et al., 201898 Poland | Pre-post | Type | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Immobilization with splints | NA | BFMDRS, Arm Dystonia Disability Scale (severity) | No significant improvement | III | |
| N | 9 | Details | Thermoplastic splint designed for each individual’s dystonia was applied to immobilize dystonic fingers and wrist | |||||||
| M/F | 1/8 | Frequency/Duration | 1 h/d, 5 d/w, 3 w | |||||||
| Age (y) | 44.3 ± 10.6 | |||||||||
| Barrett. et al., 2013104 Netherlands | Case report | Type | Lower limb dystonia | Treatment | Functional electrical stimulation of peroneal nerve | NA | 6-min walk test, single leg stance time, TUG time (performance) | Improvement in 6-min walk & single leg stance time Worsened TUG time | IV | |
| N | 1 | Details | Fitted with radio frequency-controlled device that patient used on daily basis | |||||||
| M/F | F | |||||||||
| Age (y) | 62 | Frequency/Duration | Daily, 18 months | |||||||
| Singam. et al., 2013100 USA | Pre-post | Type | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Sensorimotor retuning with writing orthotic device | NA | WCRS, VAS (performance) | Improvement in writing performance | III | |
| N | 11 | Details | Modifying standard handwriting posture with plastic orthotic device | |||||||
| M/F | NA | |||||||||
| Age (y) | 53 ± 12 | Frequency/Duration | Daily home practice, 2 w | |||||||
| Pelosin. et al., 201383 Italy | RCT cross-over | Type | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Kinesiotaping | Sham taping | VAS, WCRS (pain, severity) | Significant decrease in pain in both groups but no change in dystonia severity | II | |
| N | 10 | Details | Kinesiotape applied to skin over the affected muscle | |||||||
| M/F | 3/7 | |||||||||
| Age (y) | 48 ± 6 | Frequency/Duration | Taping every day, 2 w/condition, 1m/washout, 2m | |||||||
| Waissman. et al., 201390 Brazil | Pre-post | Type | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Immobilization of dystonic fingers with splint | NA | BFMDRS, Analog Pain Scale (severity, pain) | Significant improvement in pain & dystonia severity | III | |
| N | 12 | Details | Writing training followed by finger immobilization with specific ring in eight splints | |||||||
| M/F | 7/5 | |||||||||
| Age (y) | 52 ± 16 | Frequency/Duration | Supervised: 60min/d, 2 d/w, 8 w + Home: daily, 8 w | |||||||
| Berque. et al., 201394 UK | Pre-post | Type | Musician’s dystonia | Treatment | Immobilization of non-dystonic compensatory finger movements with splint | NA | Frequency of abnormal movement (severity) | Significant improvement in dystonia severity | IV | |
| N | 4 | Details | Retraining of motor control at slow speed + immobilization with splint | |||||||
| M/F | 7/1 | Frequency/Duration | Supervised: 2 h/d, 1 w + Home: 30–60 min/day, 4 y | |||||||
| Age (y) | 48 (30–55) | |||||||||
| Rosset-Llobet. et al., 201189 Spain | Case report | Type | Musician’s dystonia | Treatment | Sensorimotor retuning: Immobilization of non-dystonic compensatory finger movements with splint | NA | Subjective assessment (subjective) | Improvement in subjective symptoms | IV | |
| N | 1 | Details | Splinting of non-dystonic fingers and exercises for dystonic fingers | |||||||
| M/F | M | |||||||||
| Age (y) | 45 | Frequency/Duration | Daily practice, 1 y | |||||||
| Meunier. et al., 2011103 France | RCT cross-over | Type | Primary writing tremor | Treatment | TENS applied to wrist flexor muscles | Sham stimulation | Fahn–Tolosa–Marin Tremor Rating Scale (severity) | TENS at 5 and 25 Hz did not have any effect while TENS at 50 Hz worsened the clinical condition. | II | |
| N | 9 | Details | 120 % RMT, 250 μs, 5, 25 or 50 Hz, in 2-s trains separated by 2-s pauses | |||||||
| M/F | 9/0 | |||||||||
| Age (y) | 62 ± 13 | Frequency/Duration | 14 sessions (7 days for per week for two consecutive weeks) lasting 20 min each | |||||||
| Waissman. et al., 201091 Brazil | Pre-post | Type | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Immobilization of dystonic fingers with splint | NA | BFMDRS, Jedynak Writing Evaluation, pain scale (severity, performance, pain) | Improvements in all measures | III | |
| N | 2 | Details | Writing training followed by finger immobilization with specific splints | |||||||
| M/F | 1/1 | |||||||||
| Age (y) | 24, 44 | Frequency/Duration | Supervised: 60min/d, 2 d/w, 8 w + Home: daily, 8 w | |||||||
| Berque. et al., 201095 UK | Pre-post | Type | Musician’s dystonia | Treatment | Immobilization of non-dystonic compensatory finger movements with splint | NA | Frequency of abnormal movement (severity) | Significant improvement in dystonia severity | IV | |
| N | 8 | Details | Retraining of motor control at slow speed + immobilization with splint | |||||||
| M/F | 7/1 | Frequency/Duration | Supervised: 2 h/d, 1 w + Home: 30–60 min/day, 1 y | |||||||
| Age (y) | 48 (30–55) | |||||||||
| Trompetto. et al., 2009105 Italy | Cross-over | Type | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Extracorporeal shockwave therapy | Placebo shock | UDRS, Arm dystonia disability scale | Improvement in dystonia severity | III | |
| N | 3 | Details | 800–3000 pulses to dystonic muscles in hand | |||||||
| M/F | 0/3 | |||||||||
| Age (y) | 41,47,25 | Frequency/Duration | 1 session/w, 4 w | |||||||
| Zeuner. et al., 200887 Germany | RCT | Type | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Immobilization of non-dystonic compensatory finger movements followed by retraining | task non-specific motor re-training, use of therapeutic putty | WCRS (severity, performance) | Both groups significantly improved in dystonia severity & writing performance (pre-post) | I | |
| N | 26 | Details | Drawing & writing exercises with stax finger splints (pen attached) | |||||||
| M/F | 14/12 | |||||||||
| Age (y) | 49 ± 12 | Frequency/Duration | 35–60 min/d, daily, 8 w | |||||||
| Tinazzi. et al., 2006102 Italy | Case-control | Type | Writer’s cramp | Healthy control | Treatment | TENS over forearm agonist & antagonist muscles | NA | Writing performance | Significant improvement in writing time | III |
| N | 10 | 14 | Details | 1.5 mA below motor threshold, 2s trains at 150 Hz | ||||||
| M/F | 8/6 | NA | ||||||||
| Age (y) | 33 | NA | Frequency/Duration | 30 min/session, 5 sessions/w, 3w | ||||||
| Tinazzi. et al., 2005101 Italy | RCT cross-over | Type | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | TENS over forearm flexor muscles | Sham ultrasound | Dystonia movement scale, writing test, VAS (severity, subjective, performance) | Significant improvement in all outcomes | II | |
| N | 10 | Details | 50 Hz, 250 μs, below pain threshold, 2s trains | |||||||
| M/F | 5/5 | |||||||||
| Age (y) | 33 ± 4 | Frequency/Duration | 20 min/session, 5 sessions/w, 2w | |||||||
| Zeuner. et al., 200588 USA | Pre-post | Type | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Immobilization of non-dystonic compensatory finger/wrist and motor training of affected fingers | NA | BFMDRS, kinematic analysis of handwriting (severity, performance) | Mild subjective improvement | III | |
| N | 10 | Details | Train each finger individually with splint & pen | |||||||
| M/F | NA | |||||||||
| Age (y) | 54.0 ± 8.4 | Frequency/Duration | 25 min/d for 1w + 50 min/d for 3–7w | |||||||
| Pesenti. et al., 200496 Italy | Case series | Type | Musician’s dystonia | Writer’s cramp | Treatment | Dystonic hand immobilization | NA | Subjective and performance scale, hand grip test (subjective, performance, function) | Variable outcomes at follow-up | IV |
| N | 15 | 4 | Details | Immobilization with plastic splint applied to fingers and wrist | ||||||
| M/F | NA | |||||||||
| Age (y) | NA | Frequency/Duration | Daily, 4–5 w | |||||||
| Candia. et al., 200299 Germany | Pre-post | Type | Musician’s dystonia, Embouchure dystonia | Treatment | Sensory motor retuning | NA | Dystonia evaluation scale, music performance test (severity, performance) | Pianists & guitarists showed improvement Not embouchure dystonia | IV | |
| N | 11 | Details | Immobilizes one or more compensatory finger(s) with splint; Repetitive exercises for dystonic finger | |||||||
| M/F | 8/3 | |||||||||
| Age (y) | 40 (30–70) | Frequency/Duration | Supervised: 1.5–2.5 hr/day, 8d + Home: 1 hr, daily, 1y | |||||||
| Priori. et al., 200193 Italy | Pre-post | Type | Musician’s dystonia | Treatment | Immobilization therapy with splint | NA | Arm dystonia disability scale, Tubiana Chamagne score (severity, subjective, performance) | Significant improvement in dystonia severity & music performance (pianists, guitarists, drummers) | IV | |
| N | 8 | Details | Finger & wrist joints of dystonic hand immobilized with plastic splint | |||||||
| M/F | 7/1 | |||||||||
| Age (y) | 30 ± 6 | Frequency/Duration | 4.5 ± 0.75 w | |||||||
| Candia. et al., 199992 Germany | Pre-post | Type | Musician’s dystonia | Treatment | Sensory motor retuning | NA | Dystonia evaluation scale (severity) | Significant improvement in dystonia severity | IV | |
| N | 5 | Details | Immobilization by splint(s) of one or more compensatory digits other than focal dystonic finger. Repetitive exercises for dystonic finger | |||||||
| M/F | NA | |||||||||
| Age (y) | NA | Frequency/Duration | 1.5 – 2.5 h/d, 8d | |||||||
| Focal limb dystonia | ||||||||||
| Ferrara. et al., 2011106 | Pre-post | N | 12 | Treatment | TENS over muscles that were maximally affected | NA | Psychogenic Movement Disorders Rating Scale (severity) | 5/12 showed significant improvement in dystonia severity | IV | |
| M/F | NA | Details | Stimulus strength was titrated to produce a tingling sensation in the stimulated area without muscle twitching or pain, 2-sec trains, 150 Hz | |||||||
| Age (y) | NA | Frequency/Duration | 30 min/day, daily, 6.9 ± 4.7 m | |||||||
Values are shown as mean (standard deviation or SD), if SD was not available in the article min - max were shown if possible. AAN class, American Academy of Neurology classification framework; number of patients, n; male, M; female, F; year, y; month, week, w; hour, h; minute, min; second, s; not applicable, NA; Randomized controlled trial, RCT; Visual Analogue Scale, VAS; Toronto Western spasmodic torticollis rating scale, TWSTRS; Writer’s cramp rating scale, WCRS; electroencephalography, EEG; functional electrical stimulation, FES; timed up and go test, TUG; The Burke–Fahn–Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale, BFMDRS; the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale, UDRS; nerve conduction study, NCS; Somatosensory Evoked Potential test, SEP; Radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy, rESWT; Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, TENS; Motor evoked potentials, MEP; Physical therapy, PT; resting motor threshold, RMT.