Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 22;15(36):29836–29863. doi: 10.1039/d5ra04739k

Table 3. Comparative evaluation of the performance of diverse photovoltaic cell architectures with varied absorber and ETL/HTL the layout.

Structure V oc (V) J sc (mA cm−2) FF (%) PCE (%) Ref.
FTO/TiO2/Cs2AgBiBr6/spiro-OMeTAD/Au 1.511 3.89 51.76 3.04 52
ITO/SnO2/Cs2AgBiBr6/spiro-OMeTAD/Au 0.92 11.4 60.93 6.37 54
Glass/FTO/TiO2/Cs2AgBiBr6/Cu2O/Au 1.5 11.45 42.1 7.25 56
FTO/TiO2/Cs2AgSbBr6/spiro-OMeTAD/Ag 0.94 22.49 50.2 10.69 111
FTO/Ws2/Cs2CuBiBr6/spiro-OMeTAD/Ag 0.60 34.59 67.36 14.08 111
Ohmic contact/spiro-OMeTAD/Cs2BiAgI6/TiO2/SnO2: F(ZnO2)/ohmic contact 1.18 16.2 80.20 15.90 112
FTO/PCBM/Cs2BiAgI6/PTAA/Pt 1.08 19.94 74.87 16.23 113
ITO/WO3/MAPbI3/Mg-CuCrO2/Pt 0.89 23.24 83.95 17.53 114
ITO/WS2/Cs2CuBiBr6/CBTS/Ni 0.71 35.63 77.57 19.70 115
ITO/TiO2/Cs2BiAgI6/CBTS/Pt 1.08 23.80 83.61 21.55 116
FTO/TiO2/CCSCNCs/Cu2O/Pt 1.30 21.35 83.02 23.07 117
FTO/AZnO/Cs2AgBiBr6/CNTS/Pt 1.37 21.38 79.93 23.50 118
ITO/WS2/Cs2KIrCl6/V2O5 1.52 14.809 85.12 19.18 119
ITO/ZnO/Cs2KIrCl6/V2O5 1.54 15.479 89.32 21.30 119
FTO/PCBM/Rb2NaInI6/CBTS/Pt 1.38 21.34 88.92 26.26 This work
FTO/WS2/Rb2NaInI6/CBTS/Pt 1.39 21.42 89.03 26.61 This work
FTO/WO3/Rb2NaInI6/CBTS/Pt 1.39 21.37 88.95 26.73 This work
FTO/ZnO/Rb2NaInI6/CBTS/Pt 1.39 21.39 89.83 26.84 This work