Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Int. 2023 Nov 22;182:108344. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108344

Table 1.

Comparison of selected methods for outcome-wide analysis in exposome research.

GFLasso GroupRemMap MTL_L21 mRRR sRRR MBSP
Group Regularized multivariate regression framework Regularized multivariate regression framework Multitask Learning based on regularized regression Dimensionality reduction techniques Dimensionality reduction techniques Sparse multivariate Bayesian estimation with shrinkage priors
Goal Uses penalties to promote the selection of exposures affecting multiple outcomes. Uses penalties to promote the selection of exposures affecting the majority of the outcomes. Uses cross-task regularization to promote the selection of exposures affecting all outcomes. Promotes the selection of exposures affecting all the outcomes. Promotes the selection of exposures affecting all the outcomes. Promotes the selection of only few exposures affecting the majority of the outcomes.
Strategy It considers the correlation structure existing among outcomes encouraging similar (or dissimilar) responses to be explained by a similar (or dissimilar) predictors. It considers the correlation structure existing among predictors favoring the selection of groups of related exposures affecting multiple outcomes rather than single variables. It also allows considering the correlation structure existing among predictors favoring the selection of groups of correlated exposures affecting all outcomes. Assume that all the outcomes and exposures are associated through a shared low dimensional subspace. It allows considering the correlation structure existing among outcomes. Assume that all the outcomes and exposures are associated through a shared low dimensional subspace. It allows considering the correlation structure existing among outcomes. It considers the correlation structure existing among outcomes encouraging similar (or dissimilar) responses to exhibit similar (or dissimilar) coefficients for the same predictor.
Type of outcomes Only continuous Only continuous All continuous or All binary Mixed outcomes Only continuous Only continuous
Missing data in Outcomes No No No Yes No No
Variable Selection Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Allow adjusting for the effect of confounders Yes (functionality added) Yes No (partialling-out as an alternative) Yes Yes (functionality added) Yes (functionality added)
Quantification of uncertainty No No No No No Yes (95 % credible intervals)
Level of sparsity Low High Medium Low Medium High
Reference Kim et al. (2009)
Bioinformatics
Wang et al. (2015)
Stat Biosciences
Han et al. (2018)
Bioinformatics
C. Luo et al. (2018)
Journal of Multivariate Analysis
Chen et al. (2012)
Journal of the American Statistical Association
R Bai et al. (2018)
Journal of Multivariate Analysis