Table 1.
Comparison of selected methods for outcome-wide analysis in exposome research.
| GFLasso | GroupRemMap | MTL_L21 | mRRR | sRRR | MBSP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Regularized multivariate regression framework | Regularized multivariate regression framework | Multitask Learning based on regularized regression | Dimensionality reduction techniques | Dimensionality reduction techniques | Sparse multivariate Bayesian estimation with shrinkage priors |
| Goal | Uses penalties to promote the selection of exposures affecting multiple outcomes. | Uses penalties to promote the selection of exposures affecting the majority of the outcomes. | Uses cross-task regularization to promote the selection of exposures affecting all outcomes. | Promotes the selection of exposures affecting all the outcomes. | Promotes the selection of exposures affecting all the outcomes. | Promotes the selection of only few exposures affecting the majority of the outcomes. |
| Strategy | It considers the correlation structure existing among outcomes encouraging similar (or dissimilar) responses to be explained by a similar (or dissimilar) predictors. | It considers the correlation structure existing among predictors favoring the selection of groups of related exposures affecting multiple outcomes rather than single variables. | It also allows considering the correlation structure existing among predictors favoring the selection of groups of correlated exposures affecting all outcomes. | Assume that all the outcomes and exposures are associated through a shared low dimensional subspace. It allows considering the correlation structure existing among outcomes. | Assume that all the outcomes and exposures are associated through a shared low dimensional subspace. It allows considering the correlation structure existing among outcomes. | It considers the correlation structure existing among outcomes encouraging similar (or dissimilar) responses to exhibit similar (or dissimilar) coefficients for the same predictor. |
| Type of outcomes | Only continuous | Only continuous | All continuous or All binary | Mixed outcomes | Only continuous | Only continuous |
| Missing data in Outcomes | No | No | No | Yes | No | No |
| Variable Selection | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Allow adjusting for the effect of confounders | Yes (functionality added) | Yes | No (partialling-out as an alternative) | Yes | Yes (functionality added) | Yes (functionality added) |
| Quantification of uncertainty | No | No | No | No | No | Yes (95 % credible intervals) |
| Level of sparsity | Low | High | Medium | Low | Medium | High |
| Reference |
Kim et al. (2009) Bioinformatics |
Wang et al. (2015) Stat Biosciences |
Han et al. (2018) Bioinformatics |
C. Luo et al. (2018) Journal of Multivariate Analysis |
Chen et al. (2012) Journal of the American Statistical Association |
R Bai et al. (2018) Journal of Multivariate Analysis |