Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 11;16:1596408. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1596408

Table 1.

Evaluation of pose estimation methods on AFLW and PoseTrack datasets.

Model AFLW dataset PoseTrack dataset
Accuracy Recall F1 score AUC Accuracy Recall F1 score AUC
HRNet (41) 91.36 ± 0.02 89.22 ± 0.03 90.15 ± 0.02 88.45 ± 0.03 90.78 ± 0.02 87.94 ± 0.02 89.27 ± 0.03 87.63 ± 0.02
SimpleBaseline (42) 88.95 ± 0.03 87.30 ± 0.02 86.45 ± 0.03 85.78 ± 0.03 89.60 ± 0.02 88.42 ± 0.03 87.12 ± 0.02 86.89 ± 0.03
DarkPose (43) 92.12 ± 0.03 91.55 ± 0.02 90.67 ± 0.02 89.73 ± 0.02 91.94 ± 0.02 89.71 ± 0.03 90.12 ± 0.03 89.30 ± 0.02
OpenPose (44) 89.88 ± 0.02 88.66 ± 0.02 87.75 ± 0.03 86.12 ± 0.03 88.49 ± 0.02 87.20 ± 0.03 86.45 ± 0.02 85.72 ± 0.03
DEKR (45) 93.22 ± 0.03 91.03 ± 0.03 90.89 ± 0.02 90.12 ± 0.03 92.11 ± 0.03 90.85 ± 0.02 89.50 ± 0.02 89.95 ± 0.03
PRTR (46) 90.45 ± 0.02 89.18 ± 0.03 88.24 ± 0.02 87.49 ± 0.02 91.34 ± 0.03 89.72 ± 0.02 88.60 ± 0.03 87.90 ± 0.02
Ours 94.56 ± 0.02 92.34 ± 0.02 91.89 ± 0.03 92.14 ± 0.03 94.10 ± 0.03 92.87 ± 0.02 91.45 ± 0.03 91.72 ± 0.02

The values in bold are the best values.