Table 1.
Evaluation of pose estimation methods on AFLW and PoseTrack datasets.
| Model | AFLW dataset | PoseTrack dataset | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | Recall | F1 score | AUC | Accuracy | Recall | F1 score | AUC | |
| HRNet (41) | 91.36 ± 0.02 | 89.22 ± 0.03 | 90.15 ± 0.02 | 88.45 ± 0.03 | 90.78 ± 0.02 | 87.94 ± 0.02 | 89.27 ± 0.03 | 87.63 ± 0.02 |
| SimpleBaseline (42) | 88.95 ± 0.03 | 87.30 ± 0.02 | 86.45 ± 0.03 | 85.78 ± 0.03 | 89.60 ± 0.02 | 88.42 ± 0.03 | 87.12 ± 0.02 | 86.89 ± 0.03 |
| DarkPose (43) | 92.12 ± 0.03 | 91.55 ± 0.02 | 90.67 ± 0.02 | 89.73 ± 0.02 | 91.94 ± 0.02 | 89.71 ± 0.03 | 90.12 ± 0.03 | 89.30 ± 0.02 |
| OpenPose (44) | 89.88 ± 0.02 | 88.66 ± 0.02 | 87.75 ± 0.03 | 86.12 ± 0.03 | 88.49 ± 0.02 | 87.20 ± 0.03 | 86.45 ± 0.02 | 85.72 ± 0.03 |
| DEKR (45) | 93.22 ± 0.03 | 91.03 ± 0.03 | 90.89 ± 0.02 | 90.12 ± 0.03 | 92.11 ± 0.03 | 90.85 ± 0.02 | 89.50 ± 0.02 | 89.95 ± 0.03 |
| PRTR (46) | 90.45 ± 0.02 | 89.18 ± 0.03 | 88.24 ± 0.02 | 87.49 ± 0.02 | 91.34 ± 0.03 | 89.72 ± 0.02 | 88.60 ± 0.03 | 87.90 ± 0.02 |
| Ours | 94.56 ± 0.02 | 92.34 ± 0.02 | 91.89 ± 0.03 | 92.14 ± 0.03 | 94.10 ± 0.03 | 92.87 ± 0.02 | 91.45 ± 0.03 | 91.72 ± 0.02 |
The values in bold are the best values.