Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Fam Stud. 2019 Apr 19;28(6):1581–1594. doi: 10.1007/s10826-019-01390-z

Table 2.

Regression analyses predicting observed mood during the stressful interaction task

Positive mood (task 2)
Anxiety (task 2)
Hostility (task 2)
Sadness (task 2)
β t β t β t β t
Child PCC −.02 −.21 −.02 −.17 .01 .14 .01 −.31
Child SCC .37 4.45*** −.01 −.11 −.19 −2.31* −.10 −1.10
Child DC −.01 −.11 −.13 −1.13 −.07 −.65 −.11 −1.28
BDI-II −.21 −2.66** −.08 −1.00 .05 .58 −.03 −.51
Child gender .06 .71 −.02 −.19 .30 3.75*** −.04 −.44
Model adjusted R2 = .15 Model adjusted R2 = −.01 Model adjusted R2 = .11 Model adjusted R2 = −.02

Post-hoc tests were conducted for each variable adjusting the Type I error for each domain using the Bonferroni method; all values remained significant with the exception of child SCC predicting hostility (task 2)

Task 2 = Stressful interaction task; PCC = Primary control coping; SCC = Secondary control coping; DC = Disengagement coping; BDI-II = Beck Depression Inventory-II

*

p< .05

**

p< .01

***

p< .001