Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Fam Stud. 2019 Apr 19;28(6):1581–1594. doi: 10.1007/s10826-019-01390-z

Table 6.

Regression analyses predicting observed hostility during the stressful interaction task (current vs. past MDE)

Families of mothers with current MDD (N = 43)
Families of mothers with past MDD (N = 117)
Hostility (task 2)
Task 2 HS controlling for task 1 HS
Hostility (task 2)
Task 2 HS controlling for task 1 HS
β t β t β t β t
Task 1 HS .60 4.33*** .42 4.86***
Child PCC −.14 −.65 −.07 −.39 .07 .64 .08 .76
Child SCC −.19 −1.09 −.29 −2.03* −.18 −1.88 −.15 −1.72
Child DC −.36 −1.61 −.43 −2.34* .02 .19 −.06 −.52
BDI-II .11 .64 .00 −.003 .06 .60 .10 1.20
Child Gender .04 .26 .12 .83 .39 4.22*** .28 3.27***
Model adjusted R2 = −.01 Model adjusted R2 = .34 Model adjusted R2 = .15 Model adjusted R2 = .30

Child SCC and DC predicting task 2 HS controlling for task 1 HS were no longer significant following Bonferroni correction

Task 2 = Stressful interaction task; Observed mood (task 1) = Observed mood during the pleasant activity interaction task for each dependent variable; PCC = Primary control coping; SCC = Secondary control coping; DC = Disengagement coping; BDI-II = Beck Depression Inventory-II

+

p < .10

*

p < .05

***

p ≤ .001