Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Fam Stud. 2019 Apr 19;28(6):1581–1594. doi: 10.1007/s10826-019-01390-z

Table 7.

Regression analyses predicting observed hostility during the stressful interaction task (single vs. multiple MDEs)

Families of mothers with a single major depressive episode (N = 21)
Families of mothers with recurrent depression (N = 134)
Task 2 HS
Task 2 HS controlling for task 1 HS
Task 2 HS
Task 2 HS controlling for task 1 HS
β t β t β t β t
Task 1 HS .50 2.21* .43 5.49***
Child PCC .50 1.27 .31 .88 −.03 −.34 .01 .13
Child SCC −.48 −1.81+ −.38 −1.61 −.21 −2.42* −.20 −2.49*
Child DC −.11 −.31 −.11 −.34 −.08 −.76 −.14 −1.41
BDI-II −.23 −.97 −.07 −.33 .11 1.24 .13 1.74+
Child gender .11 .46 .08 .38 .34 3.94*** .26 3.32***
Model adjusted R2 = .04 Model adjusted R2 = .26 Model adjusted R2 = .15 Model adjusted R2 = .32

The following findings were no longer significant after performing the Bonferroni correction: (a) Task 1 HS predicting task 2 HS for single episode families; (b) Child SCC predicting Task 2 HS for recurrent depression families

Task 2 = Stressful interaction task; Observed mood (task 1) = Observed mood during the pleasant activity interaction task for each dependent variable; PCC = Primary control coping; SCC = Secondary control coping; DC = Disengagement coping; BDI-II = Beck Depression Inventory-II

+

p < .10

*

p < .05

***

p< .001