Table 6. Comparison of SMA's catalytic efficiency for the synthesis of 2g with that of other catalytic systems.
| Catalyst | Amount of catalyst | Yield (%) | Solvent | Time (min) | Temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yb(PFO)3 (ref. 51) | 5 mol% | 90 | EtOH | 300 | 60 |
| TBAF52 | 10 mol% | 97 | Water | 30 | Reflux |
| Re(PFO)3 (ref. 53) | 5 mol% | 90 | EtOH | 300 | 60 |
| Yb(OTf)3 (ref. 54) | 5 mol% | 78 | EtOH | 300 | 60 |
| Nano-TiO2–SO3H29 | 0.2 mol% | 90 | — | 30 | 80 |
| SMA (this work) | 1 mol% | 93 | EtOH | 15 | rt |