Skip to main content
. 2025 Jun;19(2):143–151. doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v19i2.19303

Table 4:

Association between uroflowmetry findings and patients’ characteristics in women presenting with voiding dysfunction (Part II)

Uro-flowmetry Findings Patients characteristics [n (%)]

Ant Compartment prolapse Post Compartment prolapse Apical Compartment prolapse

Mild Advance (protrude beyond hymen) P value* Mild Advance (protrude beyond hymen) P value* Mild Advance (protrude beyond hymen) P value*
Q max<12 65 (22) 37 (19.4) 0.569 87 (21.3) 15 (19.2) 0.763 74 (21.9) 28 (18.8) 0.470
Q max>12 231 (78) 154 (80.6) 322 (78.7) 63 (80.8) 264 (78.1) 121 (81.2)
T=100% T=100% T=100% T=100% T=100% T=100%
P det<20 60 (34.1) 45 (36.9) 0.624 88 (35.9) 17 (32.1) 0.637 63 (31.8) 42 (42.0) 0.095
P det>20 116 (65.9) 77 (63.1) 157 (64.1) 36 (67.9) 135 (68.2) 56 (58.0)
T=100% T=100% T=100% T=100% T=100% T=100%
PVR<50 314 (93.2) 179 (79.2) 0.0001 417 (88.3) 76 (83.5) 0.435 359 (91.8) 134 (77.9) 0.0001
PVR 50–150 17 (5.0) 38 (16.8) 43 (9.1) 12 (13.2) 26 (6.6) 29 (16.9)
PVR>150 6 (1.8) 9 (4.0) 12 (2.5) 3 (3.3) 6 (1.5) 9 (5.2)
T=100% T=100% T=100% T=100% T=100% T=100%
*

Fisher Exact test,

**

Chi-square test