TABLE 1.
Definitions and key principles of trauma-informed organisational approaches applicable to schools by origin date.
| Model and source | Definition | Key principles and values | Key actions and focus areas |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Sanctuary Model (Bloom, 1995, 1997, 2010; Bloom & Yanosy Sreedhar, 2008; Sanctuary Institute, 2022) | ‘Being trauma-informed means being sensitive to the reality of traumatic experiences in the lives of most people… It means being sensitive to the ways in which trauma has affected individuals, families and entire groups (i.e. Native Americans, African-Americans and LGBT individuals). And it means becoming sensitive to the ways in which trauma impacts organisations and entire systems.’ (Bloom & Yanosy Sreedhar, 2008, p. 51) |
|
S.E.L.F. Implementation Tool as a common language:
|
| Trauma-Informed Service Systems (Harris & Fallot, 2001) | ‘To be trauma-informed means to understand the role violence and victimisation play in the lives of consumers … and to use that understanding to design service systems that accommodate the vulnerabilities of trauma survivors and allow services to be delivered in a way that will facilitate consumer participation in treatment.’ (p. 4) |
|
|
| Trauma-Sensitive Schools (Cole et al., 2005, 2013) | ‘A trauma-sensitive school is one in which all students feel safe, welcomed and supported and where addressing trauma's impact on learning on a schoolwide basis is at the center of its educational mission. It is a place where an ongoing, inquiry-based process allows for the necessary teamwork, coordination, creativity and sharing of responsibility for all students, and where continuous learning is for educators as well as students.’ (Cole et al., 2013, p. 11) |
|
Flexible Framework for school culture change (2013)
|
| Compassionate Schools (Wolpow et al., 2016) |
|
|
Seek to extend compassion to organisational structure of the school, district, community and state. Compassionate curriculum:
|
| Trauma-Informed Programmes, Organisations, or Systems (SAMHSA, 2014a) | ‘A programme, organisation, or system that is trauma-informed realises the widespread impact of trauma and understands potential paths for recovery; recognises the signs and symptoms of trauma in clients, families, staff and others involved with the system; responds by fully integrating knowledge about trauma into policies, procedures, practices; and seek to actively resist re-traumatisation.’ (p. 9) |
|
Implementation domains:
|
| Trauma-Informed Service Systems (NCTSN, 2016, 2017) | ‘A trauma-informed child and family service system is one in which all parties involved recognise and respond to the impact of traumatic stress on those who have contact with the system including children, caregivers and service providers. Programmes and agencies within such a system infuse and sustain trauma awareness, knowledge and skills into their organisational cultures, practices and policies. They act in collaboration with all those who are involved with the child, using the best available science, to maximise physical and psychological safety, facilitate the recovery of the child and family and support their ability to thrive.’ (NCTSN, 2016) | N/A | Trauma-informed schools (NCTSN, 2017):
|
| Positive Schools (University of Maryland, n.d.) | Positive schools ‘are environments where students, adults and community members feel safe and can flourish. School teams have the expertise and training to build strong, dynamic relationships and sustain high student and staff attendance, continually decrease suspension rates and office referrals and boost academic achievement.’ |
|
N/A |
| Equity-Centred Trauma-Informed Education (Venet, 2021) | ‘Trauma-informed educational practices respond to the impacts of trauma on the entire school community and prevent future trauma from occurring. Equity and social justice are key concerns of trauma-informed educators as we make changes in our individual practice, in classrooms, in schools and in district-wide and statewide systems’ (p. 10) |
|
Four necessary shifts:
|