Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 14;122(33):e2506491122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2506491122

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Structure-guided functional optimization. (A) Schematic of 1301b_v1-ATP secondary structure shows 2′-O-Me modification on residues in the central junction (red). (B) ITC analysis of ATP binding of 1301b_v1 variants in 20 mM Mg2+. “#” means no binding. Data represent mean ± SD from three independent ITC measurements. The original ITC data are shown in SI Appendix, Figs. S27–S29. (C) ITC analysis of ATP binding of 9/10/16OMe and 1301b_v1 under different Mg2+ concentrations. “#” means no binding. Data represent mean ± SD from three independent ITC measurements. The original ITC data are shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S30. The data of 1301b_v1 in (C) is identical to those of 1301b_v1 in Fig. 4C. (D) 1D 1H NMR spectra show G H1 and T H3 signals of 9/10/16OMe in 0/1/5/10/20 mM Mg2+ without adding ATP (Top five) and 20 mM Mg2+ with one equivalent of ATP (Bottom). [DNA] = 0.1 mM, [NaPi, pH 7] = 10 mM, [NaCl] = 50 mM, 90% H2O/10% D2O, T = 20 °C.