Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Early Hum Dev. 2025 Jul 15;209:106342. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2025.106342

Table 2:

PH Screening outcomes

PH Screening All Infants Pre-Screen (n=513) All Infants Post-Screen (n=544) p-value Risk+ Pre-Screen (n=270) Risk+ Post-Screen (n=273) p-value PH+ Pre-Screen (n=59) PH+ Post-Screen (n=90) p-value
Meets criteria based on BW <750g and mechanical ventilation at 28 days 64 (12.5%) 62 (11.4%) 0.64
Meets criteria based on risk factors 119 (23.2%) 143 (26.3%) 0.25
Meets criteria for prolonged respiratory support:
HFNC 106 (20.7%) 120 (22.1%) 0.60
CPAP 35 (6.8%) 43 (7.9%) 0.56
NIPPV 145 (28.3%) 106 (19.5%) < 0.001**
Last FiO2 > 30 140 (27.3%) 178 (32.8%) 0.06
Grade 2–3 BPD 67 (13.1%) 70 (12.9%) 0.92
Meets criteria for screening 270 (52.6%) 273 (50.2%) 0.46 56 (94.9%) 83 (92.2%) 0.74
≥ 1 echo at day of life ≥ 28 179 (34.9%) 255 (46.9%) <0.001** 144 (53.3%) 196 (71.8%) <0.001**
PH+ on ≥ 1 echo ≥ day of life 28 59 (11.5%) 90 (16.5%) 0.02** 56 (20.7%) 83 (30.4%) 0.01**
DOL of 1st PH + echo ≥ DOL 28 73 (28–193) 55 (28–212) 0.01

Data presented as n(%), median (range). HFNC – High Flow Nasal Cannula ≥ 2 LPM, CPAP – Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, NIPPV – Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation