Skip to main content
. 2002 Mar;68(3):1109–1114. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.3.1109-1114.2002

TABLE 5.

QTLs for dikaryotic growth rate on SEM when different tester lines were used

Dikaryotic population Tester QTL Linkage group Positiona Probability Absolute effect (days)b R2 Total R2
D21 PC21 Qdgre1 I cap64 0.00002 2.45 25.90
Qdgre2 VI L151525 0.026 1.43 7.11 39.14
Qdgre3 VIII R11575 0.048 1.34 7.58
D23 PC23 Qdgre4 IV R91300 + 4.0 0.032 0.59 7.42
Qdgre5 VII L16875 0.034 0.52 7.24 19.51
Qdgre6 XI vmh2 0.033 0.51 7.48
D126 ME126 Qdgre7 I S122075 + 10.7 0.0038 3.85 11.81
Qdgre8 II L182900 0.045 2.91 6.26 25.75
Qdgre9 VIII R11575 + 1.0 0.013 3.40 9.15
D130 MF130 Qdgre10 I S17575 + 0.3 0.041 0.51 7.04
Qdgre11 VII L16875 0.047 0.53 7.15 20.83
Qdgre12 XI vmh2 0.042 0.50 7.00
a

Map position of QTL at marker locus plus the distance (in centimorgans) towards the bottom of the linkage group (Fig. 1).

b

Estimated absolute difference between alleles at the QTL.