Table 4. Comparison of IOP and the prevalence of OHT according to metabolic syndrome components.
| Characteristics | IOP, mmHg | P valuea | No. of patients | OHT group | P valueb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0.633 | 0.892 | ||||
| Male | 15.51 ± 0.10 | 816 | 13 (1.2) | |||
| Female | 15.45 ± 0.10 | 1,080 | 28 (1.2) | |||
| Blood pressure, mmHg | 0.014* | 0.643 | ||||
| ≥ 130/85 | 15.83 ± 0.16 | 355 | 6 (1.5) | |||
| < 130/85 | 15.40 ± 0.09 | 1,541 | 27 (1.1) | |||
| Fasting glucose, mg/dL | < 0.001* | 0.164 | ||||
| ≥ 100 | 15.84 ± 0.12 | 610 | 13 (1.7) | |||
| < 100 | 15.32 ± 0.09 | 1,286 | 20 (1.0) | |||
| Fasting insulin, μIU/mL | 0.001* | 0.129 | ||||
| ≥ 13 | 15.95 ± 0.17 | 337 | 9 (2.0) | |||
| < 13 | 15.38 ± 0.08 | 1,559 | 24 (1.0) | |||
| HOMA-IR | < 0.001* | 0.026* | ||||
| ≥ 2.34 | 15.82 ± 0.13 | 639 | 17 (2.0) | |||
| < 2.34 | 15.31 ± 0.08 | 1,257 | 16 (0.8) | |||
| BMI, kg/m2 | 0.001* | 0.301 | ||||
| ≥ 25 | 15.72 ± 0.11 | 685 | 14 (1.6) | |||
| < 25 | 15.34 ± 0.09 | 1,211 | 19 (1.0) | |||
| WC, cm | < 0.001* | 0.057 | ||||
| Male ≥ 90, Female ≥ 85 | 15.78 ± 0.12 | 569 | 15 (2.0) | |||
| Male < 90, Female < 85 | 15.35 ± 0.09 | 1,327 | 18 (0.8) | |||
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 0.001* | 0.962 | ||||
| ≥ 150 | 15.88 ± 0.15 | 474 | 9 (1.2) | |||
| < 150 | 15.34 ± 0.09 | 1,422 | 34 (1.2) | |||
| HDL-C, mg/dL | 0.879 | 0.321 | ||||
| Male < 40, Female < 50 | 15.46 ± 0.13 | 505 | 9 (0.8) | |||
| Male ≥ 40, Female ≥ 50 | 15.49 ± 0.09 | 1,391 | 24 (1.3) | |||
Values are presented as mean ± standard error or number (%), unless otherwise indicated.
IOP = intraocular pressure, OHT = ocular hypertension, HOMA-IR = homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, BMI = body mass index, WC = waist circumference, HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
aThe t-test, bThe χ2 test.
*P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.