Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 12;15:1573687. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1573687

Table 4.

Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses of 7 deep learning radiomics (DLR) models for training and validation sets.

Model Accuracy AUC (95% CI) Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
Training dataset
SVM 0.829 0.89 (0.8407-0.9399) 0.866 0.804 0.753 0.897
ExtraTrees 0.787 0.892 (0.8458-0.9388) 0.851 0.742 0.695 0.878
XGBoost 0.823 0.913 (0.8721-0.9544) 0.821 0.825 0.764 0.87
Light GBM 0.805 0.878 (0.8271-0.9279) 0.866 0.763 0.716 0.892
MLP 0.799 0.876 (0.8253-0.9276) 0.821 0.784 0.724 0.864
LR 0.823 0.90 (0.8548-0.9454) 0.881 0.784 0.737 0.905
RF 0.841 0.894 (0.8453-0.9419) 0.881 0.814 0.766 0.908
Validation dataset
SVM 0.704 0.776 (0.6659-0.8863) 0.778 0.659 0.583 0.829
ExtraTrees 0.718 0.829 (0.7347-0.9235) 0.926 0.591 0.581 0.929
XGBoost 0.746 0.832 (0.7351-0.9290) 0.815 0.705 0.629 0.861
Light GBM 0.789 0.815 (0.7120-0.9184) 0.704 0.841 0.731 0.822
MLP 0.789 0.859 (0.7743-0.9446) 0.741 0.818 0.714 0.837
LR 0.69 0.783 (0.6729-0.8927) 0.778 0.636 0.568 0.824
RF 0.69 0.79 (0.6846-0.8945) 0.852 0.591 0.561 0.867

AUC, area under the curve; SVM, support vector machine; GBM, gradient boosting machine; MLP, multilayer perceptron; LR, logistic regression; RF, random forest; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.