Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 12;15:1590133. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1590133

Table 5.

Relationship between pN stage and Borrmann type with pT stage and location (skip vs PT+EP).

pT stage and location (n) pN stage p Borrmann type p
N1(%) N2(%) N3a(%) N3b(%) Borrmann I (%) Borrmann II(%) Borrmann III(%) Borrmann IV(%)
pT stage 0.001 <0.001
T1 6(31.6%) 10(52.6%) 3(15.8%) 0(0.0%) 19(100.0%) 0(0.0%) 0(0.0%) 0(0.0%)
T2 16(25.0%) 18(28.1%) 25(39.1%) 5 (7.8%) 0(0.0%) 16(25.0%) 44(68.8%) 4(6.3%)
T3 30(16.9%) 57(32.0%) 66(37.1%) 25(14.0%) 3(1.7%) 29(16.3%) 140(78.7%) 6(3.4%)
T4 15(8.1%) 57(30.8%) 73(39.5%) 40(21.6%) 5(2.7%) 20(10.8%) 139(75.1%) 21(11.4%)
Location 0.454 <0.001
Lower 47(16.0%) 89(30.4%) 115(39.2%) 42(14.3%) 21(7.2%) 45(15.4%) 210(71.7%) 17(5.8%)
Middle 11(12.9%) 25(29.4%) 33(38.8%) 16(18.8%) 3(3.5%) 8(9.4%) 70(82.4%) 4(4.7%)
Upper 8(16.3%) 19(38.8%) 15(30.6%) 7(14.3%) 2(4.1%) 9(18.4%) 36(73.5%) 2(4.1%)
≥2/3 stomach 1(5.3%) 9(47.4%) 4(21.1%) 5(26.3%) 1(5.3%) 3(15.8%) 7(36.8%) 8(42.1%)

Significant p values are in bold.

PT peritumoral, EP extraperitumoral.