Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 12;16:1651751. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1651751

Table 1.

Summary of selected studies assessing salivary hepcidin concentration in various clinical contexts.

First author, year Study population Number of participants Age, years (Mean ± SD) Sex of participants (M/F) Hepcidin assay Salivary hepcidin concentration [ng/mL] (Mean ± SD or Median [IQR]) Key findings
Arnold, J., 2010 (5) Healthy individuals 17 35 ± 9.9 8/9 RIA 3.39 ± 2.83 Hepcidin is detectable in saliva
Cicek, D., 2014 (6) Behçet’s disease (BD) 25 34.48 ± 6.9 13/12 ELISA 657.58 ± 358.25 Increased hepcidin concentration in RAS patients
Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) 30 31.56 ± 11.5 15/15 443.10 ± 249.68
Healthy individuals 25 31.52 ± 6.2 13/12 714.10 ± 280.58
Guo, L. N., 2018 (7) Chronic periodontitis (CP) 22 58.09 ± 9.97 16/6 ELISA 1.64 [0.93, 3.19] No significant differences between study groups
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) 22 56.45 ± 11.80 15/7 1.54 [0.99, 3.80]
CP+T2DM 22 62.82 ± 10.72 17/5 1.79 [0.93, 5.14]
Healthy individuals 22 52.45 ± 10.01 14/8 1.12 [0.89, 1.73]

BD, Behçet’s disease; CP, Chronic periodontitis; ELISA, Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; F, Female; IQR, Interquartile range; M, Male; RAS, Recurrent aphthous stomatitis; RIA, Radioimmunoassay; SD, Standard deviation; T2DM, Type 2 diabetes mellitus.