Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 12;19:1631958. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1631958

FIGURE 2.

Graph A and B depict motor performance as a function of cumulative deliberate practice, considering content, duration, intensity, and quality. Graph A shows high and low learning potential trajectories with achievement motivation affecting performance. Graph B includes high and low motor learning (ML) efficiency variations, emphasizing achievement motivation’s role. Maximum theoretical motor learning potential is indicated in both graphs.

Efficiency and potential of motor performance development trajectories, considering achievement motivation and deliberate practice. (A) Advantages based on differences in improvement potential (low vs. high learning potential). (B) Differences based on motor learning efficiency (ML, low vs. high) and improvement potential (low vs. high learning potential).