Table 2:
TTS 2019 Consensus and the authors’ proposed treatment approaches, based on expert opinion (ungraded practice recommendations).
| 2019 Consensus | DSA | Banff 2017 phenotypes | SOC | Consider adjunctive therapies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early acute (<30 days) | Preexisting DSA (or nonimmunologicaly naïve) |
Active AMR | • Plasmapheresis/IVIGa • Steroids |
• Complement inhibitors • Rituximab • Splenectomy |
| Late (>30 days) | Preexisting DSA | Active AMR | • Plasmapheresis/IVIGa • Steroids |
• Rituximab |
| Chronic AMR | • Optimize baseline immunosuppressionb | |||
| De novo DSA | Active AMR | • Optimize baseline immunosuppressionb • Evaluate and manage non-adherence |
• Plasmapheresis, IVIG • Rituximab |
|
| Chronic AMR | • IVIG | |||
| Authors’ proposal | DSA | Banff 2022 phenotypes | Primary treatment | Consider adjunctive therapies |
| General considerations: | ||||
| Consider the following when deciding on the type and intensity of treatment: • Severity and acuity of graft dysfunction (e.g. activity index): May determine the intensity of the chosen treatment. • Level of chronic injury at the time of biopsy(chronicity index): this helps exclude unmodifiable chronic damage. • Presence of comorbidities: Avoids increased risks associated with over-immunosuppression. • Recipient age: Presumably, elderly patients derive less benefit. • If concomitant TCMR is diagnosed, also treatment with corticosteroids, ATG, or alemtuzumab should be considered. • Consider follow-up biopsies for early detection of phenotype transition (e.g. transition to active AMR after a diagnosis of probable or of probable AMR) or for treatment monitoring. |
||||
| Early (<6 months) | Preexisting (and/or de novo) DSA | Active AMR (chronic-active AMR) | • Apheresis (Plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption) with or without IVIGc • Optimize baseline immunosuppressionb |
• CD38 antibodyd • Complement inhibitione |
| Probable AMR | • Optimize baseline immunosuppressionb | • CD38 antibodyd | ||
| No DSA | MVI, C4d-/DSA-negative | • Optimize baseline immunosuppressionb | • CD38 antibodyd | |
| Late (>6 months) | De novo (and/or preexisting) DSA | Active/chronic-active AMR | • Optimize baseline immunosuppressionb • CD38 antibodyd |
|
| Chronic AMR | • Optimize baseline immunosuppressionb | |||
| Probable AMR | • Optimize baseline immunosuppressionb | • CD38 antibodyd | ||
| No DSA | MVI, C4d-/DSA-negative | • Optimize baseline immunosuppressionb,f | • CD38 antibodyd | |
ATG, antithymocyte globulin; PP, plasmapheresis.
Daily or alternate day plasmapheresis sessions × 6 based on DSA titer; IVIG 100 mg/kg after each plasmapheresis treatment or IVIG 2/kg at end of plasmapheresis treatments
Includes the use of tacrolimus with goal through levels of >5 ng/ml and use of maintenance steroid equivalent to prednisone 5 mg/day.
We suggest apheresis treatment courses over 2–3 weeks, starting with three daily treatments, followed by sessions every 2–3 days. Optionally, high-dose IVIG (2 g/kg) may be administered at the end of the apheresis course.
CD38 targeting may include the use of daratumumab at 16 mg/kg; weekly over 1 month (pretreatment before the first two administrations to prevent first dose reactions), followed by monthly doses until months 3–6. The duration of treatment may be guided by dd-cfDNA monitoring and/or follow-up biopsy results.
Complement inhibition may include the administration of one or more doses of eculizumab.
In DSA- and C4d-negative MVI, a switch from mycophenolic acid to an mTOR inhibitor may be considered for optimization of maintenance immunosuppression.