Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 1;60(9):2135–2147. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02879-3

Table 2.

Results of the mixed effects regression model for the primary outcome and the secondary outcomes

N Time
b
(95% CI)1
GBV vs. TAU
b
(95% CI)1
Time * GBV vs. TAU
b
(95% CI)1
Constant
b
(95% CI)1
Cohen’s
d
t4 – t0
(95% CI)
EPAS total 923

0·07***

(0·05 0·08)

0·00

(-0·09 0·09)

0·03***

(0·01 0·05)

2·99

(2·96 3·04)

0.27

(0.14 0.40)

HoNOS total score 927

-1·24***

(-1·62 -0·86)

-0·31

(-0·75 0·13)

0·12

(-0·04 0·28)

14·8

(14·08 15·54)

0.07

(-0.14 0.16)

WHOQOL-BREF 922

2·37***

(1·83 2·91)

0·59

(-1·30 2·49)

0·87**

(0·36 1·38)

38·77

(36·91 40·63)

0.22

(0.09 0.35)

ZUF-8 922

0·44***

(0·31 0·57)

1·34

(0·76 1·93)

0·40***

(0·23 0·58)

20·52

(19·97 21·07)

0.41

(0.28 0.54)

CAN Number of unmet needs / total number of needs 927

-0·04***

(-0·05 -0·04)

-0·53**

(-0·08 -0·02)

-0·02***

(-0·02 − 0·01)

0·68

(0·60 0·75)

-0.26

(-0.39 -0.13)

1 Robust standard errors to take into account clustered variance at 12 sites

EPAS = Assessment of Empowerment in Patients with Affective and Schizophrenic Disorders; HoNOS = Health of the Nations Outcome Scale; WHOQOL-BREF = WHO Quality of Life questionnaire Brief version; ZUF-8 = Service Satisfaction Questionnaire; CAN = Camberwell Assessment of Needs