Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 12;16:1629866. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1629866

TABLE 4.

Genotype distribution and comparison results with allele frequency of the study population in the ADR research group.

SNP Id Observation subgroup n = 190 (%) Control subgroup n = 190 (%) χ2 P-value OR (95% CI)
CYP2D6*10 (rs1065852, C>T)
CC 86 (45.26) 75 (39.47)
CT 68 (35.79) 84 (44.21)
TT 36 (18.95) 31 (16.32)
CT + TT 104 (54.74) 115 (60.53) 3.160 0.368* 1.049 (0.921–1.195)
Allelic
C 240 (63.16) 234 (61.58)
T 140 (36.84) 146 (38.42) 0.202 0.653 1.070 (0.798–1.435)
OPRM1 (rs1799971, A>G)
AA 99 (52.11) 72 (37.89)
AG 66 (34.74) 92 (48.42)
GG 25 (13.16) 26 (13.68)
AG + GG 91 (47.90) 118 (62.10) 10.834 0.013* 1.164 (1.021–1.327)
Allelic
A 264 (69.47) 236 (62.11)
G 116 (30.53) 144 (37.89) 4.583 0.032 1.389 (1.028–1.876)
ABCB1(rs1045642, C>T)
CC 64 (33.68) 72 (37.89)
CT 95 (50.00) 90 (47.37)
TT 31 (16.32) 28 (14.74)
CT + TT 126 (66.32) 118 (62.11) 1.353 0.717* 0.943 (0.826–1.077)
Allelic
C 223 (58.68) 234 (61.58)
T 157 (41.32) 146 (38.42) 1.127 0.288 0.852 (0.634–1.145)
CYP3A5*3 (rs776746, A>G)
AA 28 (14.74) 22 (11.58)
AG 60 (31.58) 57 (30.00)
GG 102 (53.68) 111 (58.42)
AG + GG 162 (85.26) 168 (88.42) 1.236 0.744* 1.066 (0.911–1.246)
Allelic
A 116 (30.53) 101 (26.58)
G 264 (69.47) 279 (73.42) 1.451 0.228 1.214 (0.885–1.664)

Note: * indicates calculations based on grouped phenotypes: CT + TT vs CC and AG + GG vs AA.