Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 12;16:1629866. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1629866

TABLE 6.

Genetic model analysis of the correlation between genetic polymorphism and the incidence of ADRs.

SNP Id Model Genotype OR 95% CI P-value AIC
CYP2D6*10 (rs1065852, C>T) Codominant CC/CT/TT 1.05 0.92–1.19 0.368 1890.5
Dominant CT/TT vs. CC 1.07 0.80–1.43 0.653 1895.0
Recessive TT vs. CC/CT 1.02 0.89–1.16 0.718 1898.2
Overdominant CT vs. CC/TT 0.98 0.87–1.11 0.489 1900.3
Allelic T vs. C 1.04 0.88–1.22 0.323 1893.6
OPRM1 (rs1799971, A>G) Codominant AA/AG/GG 1.16 1.02–1.33 0.013 1885.2
Dominant AG/GG vs. AA 1.28 1.10–1.48 0.025 1891.3
Recessive GG vs. AA/AG 1.12 0.97–1.29 0.068 1889.0
Overdominant AG vs. AA/GG 1.05 0.92–1.21 0.199 1887.5
Allelic G vs. A 1.34 1.10–1.64 0.032 1892.3
ABCB1(rs1045642, C>T) Codominant CC/CT/TT 0.94 0.83–1.08 0.717 1900.1
Dominant CT/TT vs. CC 0.85 0.63–1.15 0.288 1903.5
Recessive TT vs. CC/CT 1.09 0.94–1.27 0.412 1904.6
Overdominant CT vs. CC/TT 1.01 0.88–1.15 0.602 1902.4
Allelic T vs. C 0.98 0.78–1.21 0.492 1901.2
CYP3A5*3 (rs776746, A>G) Codominant AA/AG/GG 1.08 0.91–1.25 0.312 1898.2
Dominant AG/GG vs. AA 1.05 0.85–1.31 0.444 1899.8
Recessive GG vs. AA/AG 1.07 0.89–1.27 0.522 1901.5
Overdominant AG vs. AA/GG 1.02 0.82–1.19 0.601 1903.3
Allelic G vs. A 1.11 0.94–1.31 0.228 1904.1