TABLE 2.
Assessment of our method relative to SOTA techniques on the IU X-ray and VinDr-CXR datasets.
| Model | IU X-ray dataset | VinDr-CXR dataset | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | Recall | F1 score | AUC | Accuracy | Recall | F1 score | AUC | |
| DRAEM Gui et al. (2024) | 87.10 0.02 | 83.95 0.03 | 84.62 0.02 | 89.88 0.02 | 82.75 0.02 | 79.43 0.03 | 80.11 0.02 | 85.23 0.02 |
| PaDiM Murakami et al. (2024) | 85.74 0.03 | 81.23 0.02 | 83.41 0.02 | 88.41 0.02 | 84.92 0.02 | 81.76 0.02 | 82.55 0.03 | 86.79 0.02 |
| SPADE Lee et al. (2024) | 86.23 0.02 | 80.87 0.02 | 82.16 0.03 | 87.55 0.03 | 83.14 0.03 | 80.11 0.02 | 81.05 0.02 | 84.67 0.03 |
| AE-SSIM Sun et al. (2024) | 84.61 0.02 | 79.32 0.02 | 80.74 0.03 | 86.28 0.03 | 81.23 0.03 | 78.90 0.02 | 79.48 0.03 | 83.94 0.02 |
| WinCLIP Cao et al. (2024) | 88.09 0.02 | 84.78 0.03 | 85.10 0.02 | 90.31 0.02 | 85.90 0.03 | 82.34 0.02 | 83.21 0.02 | 88.45 0.03 |
| STPM Liang et al. (2025) | 85.91 0.02 | 81.89 0.02 | 83.07 0.03 | 88.74 0.02 | 84.63 0.02 | 80.70 0.03 | 82.16 0.02 | 86.01 0.03 |
| Ours | 90.42 0.02 | 87.56 0.02 | 88.33 0.03 | 92.84 0.02 | 88.73 0.02 | 85.91 0.02 | 86.67 0.03 | 91.03 0.02 |