Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 26;25:1204. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07583-z

Table 4.

Comparisons of the students’ responses in the survey domains according to their study level (n = 94)

Variable Comparison N (group 1) Mean rank (group 1) N (group 2) Mean rank (group 2) Mann-Whitney U test Z P-value*
Portfolio design 4th vs. 5th Year 32 42.2 37 28.77 361 -2.79 0.01
4th vs. 6th Year 32 31.8 25 25.42 310.5 -1.45 0.15
5th vs. 6th Year 37 28.43 25 36.04 349 -1.64 0.10
Feedback and reflection 4th vs. 5th Year 32 43.62 37 27.54 316 -3.33 0.00
4th vs. 6th Year 32 34.41 25 22.08 227 -2.79 0.01
5th vs. 6th Year 37 30.96 25 32.3 442.5 -0.29 0.77
Use of portfolio in assessment 4th vs. 5th Year 32 42.72 37 28.32 345 -3.0 0.00
4th vs. 6th Year 32 34.34 25 22.16 229 -2.78 0.01
5th vs. 6th Year 37 31.92 25 30.88 447 -0.23 0.82
Portfolio receptivity 4th vs. 5th Year 32 41.27 37 29.58 391 -2.45 0.01
4th vs. 6th Year 32 31.58 25 25.7 317.5 -1.36 0.17
5th vs. 6th Year 37 29.39 25 34.62 384.5 -1.15 0.25
Portfolio usefulness 4th vs. 5th Year 32 42.12 37 28.84 364 -2.82 0.01
4th vs. 6th Year 32 32.19 25 24.92 298 -1.7 0.09
5th vs. 6th Year 37 29.01 25 35.18 370.5 -1.36 0.18
Usefulness scale 4th vs. 5th Year 32 41.89 37 29.04 371.5 -2.67 0.01
4th vs. 6th Year 32 33.34 25 23.44 261 -2.25 0.02
5th vs. 6th Year 37 30.0 25 33.72 407 -0.803 0.42

*P-value is significant if < 0.05