Table 3.
Associations between digital exclusion and loneliness
| CHARLS | HRS | ELSA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR/β (95% CI) P value | OR/β (95% CI) P value | OR/β (95% CI) P value | ||
| loneliness | Model 1 | 1.69 (1.45, 1.97) <0.0001 | 1.44 (1.37, 1.51) <0.0001 | 1.62 (1.49, 1.76) <0.0001 |
| Model 2 | 1.36 (1.15, 1.60) 0.0003 | 1.26 (1.19, 1.33) <0.0001 | 1.37 (1.25, 1.51) <0.0001 | |
| Model 3 | 1.22 (1.03, 1.44) 0.0208 | 1.16 (1.09, 1.23) <0.0001 | 1.30 (1.19, 1.43) <0.0001 | |
| Match | Model 1 | 1.97 (1.59, 2.43) <0.0001 | 1.12 (1.02, 1.22) 0.0196 | 1.32 (1.15, 1.51) <0.0001 |
| Model 2 | 1.41 (1.13, 1.77) 0.0024 | 1.20 (1.09, 1.32) 0.0002 | 1.30 (1.13, 1.51) 0.0004 | |
| Model 3 | 1.33 (1.06, 1.67) 0.0150 | 1.23 (1.11, 1.35) <0.0001 | 1.23 (1.06, 1.43) 0.0055 |
CHARLS China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study,HRS Health and Retirement Study ,ELSA English Longitudinal Study of Ageing
Model 1: unadjusted
Model 2: adjust for Age; Gender; Education; marital/partnered statusModel 3: adjust for Age; Gender; Education; marital/partnered status; employment status; cohabitation with children; Self-rated health; Income