Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 26;67(1):296–345. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00716

Figure 3.

2 graphs depict the variation in the average quality rating for the behavioural and the electrophysiologic measures. The legend for the cognitive construct is as follows. Circle: Exhibit or inhibit. Triangle: Fluid. Square: Multi. Plus: Proc S. Square with diagonals: Vis P. Asterisk: W M. The legend for the relationship is as follows. Green: Non. Blue: Sig. The data for the behavioural measures are as follows. Altered. Blue plus: 2.6. Blue asterisk: 3.6. Green asterisk: 4.3. Green plus: 4.5. Binaural. Green square: 3.5 and 4. Green plus: 4. Green asterisk: 4.4. Blue asterisk: 4.3. SIN. Blue plus: 3. Green plus: 3.7. Green square with diagonals: 4.3. Blue square: 4.5. Green circle: 4.6. Blue asterisk: 4.7. Green square: 6. Temporal. Blue circle: 3. Blue square: 4. Blue asterisk: 4.4. Blue triangle: 4.7. Green triangle: 5. Green asterisk: 5. The data for the electrophysiologic measures is as follows. M M N. Green square: 4.5. Green plus: 4.5. Green asterisk: 4.7. Blue asterisk: 5. N 200. Blue circle: 4. Green square: 4.5. Blue asterisk: 4.5. Blue square: 5. P 200. Blue square: 4. P 300. Green circle: 3.8. Blue square: 4. Blue circle: 4.4. Blue asterisk: 4.5. Green asterisk: 4.8. P 50. Green asterisk: 3. Green square: 4. Blue plus: 4. Blue square: 6.

Average quality ratings of studies with relationships between auditory behavioral (left) and electrophysiologic (right) and cognitive constructs measured in more than one study. SIN = Speech in Noise; MMN = mismatch negativity; Ex/Inhib = Executive/Inhibitory Processes; Fluid = Fluid Intelligence; Multi = Multiple-Domains; ProcS = Processing Speed; VisP = Visual Perception; WM = Working Memory.