Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul;64(4):682–695. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-151

Table 1.

Study design highlighting the strain, age, sex, number of cages, scoring criteria, cage change criteria, and microenvironmental validation measures for each study

Study Phase Age/sex No. of cages at beginning of study No. of cages at end of study Study duration (wk) Scoring criteria Cage change criteria Microenvironmental validation measure
Mixed strains Learning Variable, unequal number of males and females 100 98 10 Visual scoring: score of 1, small (diameter 1–2 in.), light-brown urine spots with diffuse boundaries; score of 2, moderate-sized (diameter 2–3 in.), medium-brown urine spots with diffuse boundaries; score of 3, moderate- to large-sized (diameter 3–4 in.), dark-brown urine spots with distinct edges; score of 4, large (diameter 5–6 in.), dark-brown urine spots with distinct edges Two of 3 observers score 3 or 4 None
Swiss Webster Learning Variable, unequal number of males and females 28 28 4 Two of 3 observers score 3 or 4, ammonia level >50 ppm Ammonia (Draeger X-am 5000 and pump)
C57BL/6J Learning Six weeks old, equal numbers of males and females 120 109 7 Ammonia (Draeger X-am 5000 and pump, small animal ammonia sensor), CO2 sensor
C57BL/6J Validation Fifteen to 16 wk old, equal numbers of males and females 120 109 8 BSI measured 24/7 by digital caging AI algorithm based on BSI values determined cage change interval None
BALB/c Validation Six weeks old, equal numbers of males and females 30 28 7 Ammonia (Draeger X-am 5000 and pump), CO2 sensor