Table 2. Cerium (iii/iv) redox potential. [Ce^IV(TriNOx)]⁺ derivatives, several common Ce^IV complexes, and several Ce^IV–C complexes from the literature are shown for comparison.

Complex	E pc	E 1/2
[Ce(TriNOx)](OTf)	−1.04 V	−0.95 V
[Ce(TriNOx)]I	−1.04 V	—
[Ce(TriNOx)Br]	−1.16 V (−1.04 V)	—
[Ce(TriNOx)Cl]	−1.26 V	—
[Ce(TriNOx)F]	−1.40 V	−1.36 V
[M][Ce(TriNOx) NAr]	−1.39 V to −1.45 V	—
[Ce(TriNOx)(C CPh)]	−1.58 V	−1.49 V (E p ) a
[Ce(TriNOx)(C CTMS)]	−1.66 V	−1.57 V (E p ) a
[NnBu4]2[Ce(NO3)6]	—	0.62 V
[CeCl6]2−	—	0.03 V
[Ce[N(SiMe3)2]3Cl]	—	−0.30 V
[Ce(COT)2]	—	−1.40 V
[Ce(BIPMTMS)2]	—	−1.63 V
[Li(THF)4][Ce(κ2-ortho-oxa)(MBP)2]	−1.67 V	—
[CeIV(Alkyl)(NP(tert-butyl)3)3]	b−2.55 V to −2.92 V	—

^a E _p stands for redox potential from differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) instead of E_1/2.

^bThe scan rate was unknown, while other E_pc values were measured at a 100 mV s⁻¹ scan rate.