Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 26;8:e65641. doi: 10.2196/65641

Table 1. Characteristics of the study participants.

Characteristics Values (N=1163)a
Age (years), mean (SD) 51.9 (9.6)
Sex, n (%)
 Male 80 (6.9)
 Female 1083 (93.1)
Education, (n%)
 Primary or lower secondary 24 (2.1)
 Upper secondary ≤2 years 459 (39.5)
 Upper secondary 3 years 501 (43.1)
 Postsecondary <3 years 124 (10.7)
 Postsecondary ≥3 years 55 (4.7)
Workplace, n (%)
 Home care 382 (32.8)
 Care home 752 (64.7)
Work experience (years), n (%)
 ≥15 902 (77.6)
 10‐14 146 (12.6)
 <10 110 (9.5)
Welfare technologies, n (%)
 Digital locks 619 (53.2)
 Cameras or sensors 387 (33.3)
 Digital support in medicine 362 (31.1)
 Activity and training 110 (9.5)
 Digital support in grocery shopping 169 (14.5)
 Digital communication between care provider and care recipient 103 (8.9)
 Digital communication between colleagues 271 (23.3)
 Digital documentation and planning 852 (73.3)
 Not using welfare technologies 64 (5.8)
Training in the use of welfare technologies, n (%) 606 (52.1)
Continuity of care, n (%) 603 (51.8)
Patient participation, n (%) 511 (43.1)
Reduction in loneliness or social isolation, n (%) 420 (36.1)
Upskilling, n (%) 810 (69.6)
a

Missing data were 2.5% for workplace and 0.4% for work experience. A total of 51 participants lacked complete information on welfare technologies, training, and dependent variables. Missing values for dependent variables were 9% for training, 11% for continuity of care, 10% for participation, and 8% for upskilling.