Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: Lung Cancer. 2025 Jul 28;207:108681. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108681

Table 2.

Lesion-Level Characteristics and Small Biopsy Specimen Pattern Identification Analysis*

Variable Full Cohort (n=242) Cohort Subgroups
Pattern Identified (n=172) Pattern Not Identified (n=70) P-Value
Largest Dimension (mm) 23.0 (16.0–32.8) 23.2 (1.60–32.9) 22.1 (15.6–32.8) >0.9
Radiographic Consistency >0.9
Solid 159 (66) 113 (71) 46 (29)
Non-Solid** 83 (34) 59 (66) 24 (34)
Lung Zone*** 0.9
Upper 164 (68) 117 (71) 47 (29)
Lower 78 (32) 55 (70) 23 (30)
Centrality 0.007
Inner 2/3 126 (52) 80 (47) 46 (66)
Outer 1/3 116 (48) 92 (53) 24 (34)
Number of Traversed Airway Generations 0.2
<7 80 (33) 53 (63) 27 (37)
≥7 162 (67) 119 (73) 43 (27)
Radial Probe EBUS
Not Used 33 (14) 22 (67) 11 (33)
Used 209 (86) 150 (72) 59 (28) 0.6
Concentric 96 (46) 66 (69) 30 (31)
Eccentric 80 (38) 60 (75) 20 (25)
No View 33 (16) 24 (73) 9 (27)
Intraoperative Imaging 0.8
Pulsed Fluoroscopy Only 62 (26) 45 (73) 17 (27)
Pulsed Fluoroscopy and CBCT 180 (74) 127 (71) 53 (29)
Forceps Biopsy Performed 229 (95) 161 (70) 68 (30) 0.4
Cryobiopsy Performed 51 (21) 45 (88) 6 (12) 0.002

CBCT, cone-beam computed tomography; EBUS, endobronchial ultrasound.

*

Summaries are presented as median (interquartile range) or n (%).

**

A composite variable including semi-solid, pure groundglass, and cavitary lesions.

***

Upper lung zone includes the upper and middle lobes while the lower lung zone includes the lower lobes.