Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Aug 27.
Published in final edited form as: Dysphagia. 2025 May 16;40(6):1414–1422. doi: 10.1007/s00455-025-10840-4

Table 3.

Agreement analysis of Safety, Efficiency, and DIGEST grades at different frame rates (excluding MBSs with DIGEST = 0 at 30 FPS)

Grade FPS No. of disagreements Agreement percentage (%) Simple Cohen’s Kappa (95% CI) Weighted Cohen’s Kappa (95% CI) PABAK (95% CI) AC1 (95% CI)
Safety 30 vs. 15 39 83.40 0.780 (0.715, 0.837) 0.828 (0.777, 0.878) 0.793 (0.734, 0.851) 0.795 (0.736, 0.854)
30 vs. 7.5 37 84.26 0.792 (0.730, 0.852) 0.837 (0.788, 0.886) 0.803 (0.745, 0.856) 0.806 (0.748, 0.864)
15 vs. 7.5 37 84.26 0.791 (0.729, 0.848) 0.831 (0.779, 0.882) 0.803 (0.745, 0.856) 0.806 (0.748, 0.864)
Efficiency 30 vs. 15 35 85.11 0.779 (0.709, 0.843) 0.821 (0.766, 0.876) 0.814 (0.755, 0.867) 0.821 (0.765, 0.876)
30 vs. 7.5 40 82.98 0.745 (0.676, 0.807) 0.796 (0.738, 0.853) 0.787 (0.729, 0.846) 0.796 (0.737, 0.854)
15 vs. 7.5 39 83.40 0.752 (0.677, 0.811) 0.799 (0.741, 0.857) 0.793 (0.729, 0.851) 0.801 (0.743, 0.859)
DIGEST 30 vs. 15 42 82.13 0.741 (0.669, 0.808) 0.778 (0.717, 0.838) 0.777 (0.713, 0.835) 0.784 (0.724, 0.844)
30 vs. 7.5 37 84.26 0.771 (0.701, 0.832) 0.805 (0.747, 0.863) 0.803 (0.745, 0.862) 0.81 (0.753, 0.867)
15 vs. 7.5 36 84.68 0.779 (0.714, 0.841) 0.810 (0.752, 0.867) 0.809 (0.750, 0.862) 0.815 (0.759, 0.871)