Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Aug 27.
Published in final edited form as: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2025 Jul 1;57(12):2830–2837. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003802

Table 4:

Multivariable cox regression analysis for the association of increasing cardiopulmonary fitness by one MET and subsequent cardiovascular disease in survivors with lower cardiopulmonary fitness levels and survivors with higher cardiopulmonary fitness levels.

Subsequent cardiovascular disease
Low cardiopulmonary fitness group
Normal cardiopulmonary fitness group
HR 95% CI HR 95% CI

Cardiopulmonary fitness

 Increase of one MET 0.78 0.65, 0.96 0.90 0.70, 1.15
Cardiovascular disease at baseline
 Yes 2.4 1.41, 4.1 1.34 0.51, 3.60
 No 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Obesity at baseline
 Yes 0.71 0.39, 1.31 0.99 0.39, 2.52
 No 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Impaired glucose metabolism at baseline
 Yes 1.81 0.90, 3.65 0.62 0.08, 4.88
 No 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Hypertension at baseline
 Yes 0.81 0.44, 1.48 0.46 0.15, 1.41
 No 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Anthracyclines
 Yes 1.78 1.05, 3.02 4.23 1.53, 11.644
 No 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Chest radiation
 Yes 1.25 0.76, 2.08 1.88 0.84, 4.19
 No 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

Categories were made from the distribution of peak METs the survivors achieved on the CPET, separated by age and sex

Low/Below average (< 50%), above average/high (≥ 50%)

Additionally adjusted for age, age at diagnosis, meeting 2018 CDC physical activity guidelines, smoking and gender

237 survivors were missing their CPET and could not be classified as low or below average. The reasons included acute injury (1), cardiovascular (112), diabetes (26), gastrointestinal (1), kidney disease (16), liver failure (2) musculoskeletal impairment (40), neurological impairment (10), paralysis (4), pulmonary impairment (15), cerebrovascular impairment (9), recent surgery (1). MET = Metabolic equivalent; HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval