Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jun 2.
Published in final edited form as: Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993. 2025 Jun 2;237:113013. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113013

Table 1.

Point dose values comparison between the Monte Carlo calculations and experimental measurements.

Dosimeter Channel Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Pelvis Phantom material Bone Bone Soft tissue Soft tissue Bone Bone Soft tissue Soft tissue Bone Soft tissue
Calculated dose (mGy) 36.8 42.1 12.3 17.4 41.3 42.9 12.9 14.0 49.9 18.0
Measured dose (mGy) * 38.6 43.7 10.6 14.7 42.8 46.00 13.1 14.2 50.1 14.8
Difference (%) 4.9 3.6 16.1 18.6 3.4 6.7 1.7 1.5 0.5 21.3
Chest Phantom material Soft tissue Soft tissue Lung Bone Bone Soft tissue Lung Soft tissue Lung Soft tissue
Calculated dose(mGy) 11.4 16.7 15.1 46.9 47.8 15.8 16.1 16.7 13.1 15.1
Measured dose (mGy) * 11.6 15.7 13.4 47.9 47.9 18.4 16.1 13.1 12.3 13.1
Difference (%) 1.7 6.6 13.0 2.0 0.1 13.9 0.1 27.5 6.4 15.5
*

The measurement errors for each dosimeter are below 5%, in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications and calibration results.