Table 1.
Comparative analysis of PV inverter fault diagnosis approaches.
| Approach | Key methods | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model-based16 & Signal-based20 | Sliding mode observers; extended Kalman filters; Adaptive observers; FFT; STFT; wavelet transform | Provides insightful diagnostics; good at detecting transient faults; effective for periodic fault detection | Requires accurate system models; performance degrades with noise; limited adaptability; struggles with complex systems |
| Statistical methods25 | K-nearest neighbor; Wolf optimization; independent component analysis; random forest; ensemble methods | Robust pre-processing capabilities; good for handling imbalanced data; effective feature extraction; better performance through hybrid approaches | Limited representation learning; may require extensive feature engineering; performance depends on data quality |
| Deep learning33,34 | 1D-CNN; 2D-CNN; hybrid CNN (HCNN); CNN-LSTM; pyramid-structured networks | High diagnostic accuracy; strong pattern recognition; good at handling complex data; real-time detection capability | Requires extensive preprocessing; limited generalization; high computational demands; limited spatial dependency handling |