Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 26;15:31330. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16551-y

Table 1.

Comparative analysis of PV inverter fault diagnosis approaches.

Approach Key methods Advantages Limitations
Model-based16 & Signal-based20 Sliding mode observers; extended Kalman filters; Adaptive observers; FFT; STFT; wavelet transform Provides insightful diagnostics; good at detecting transient faults; effective for periodic fault detection Requires accurate system models; performance degrades with noise; limited adaptability; struggles with complex systems
Statistical methods25 K-nearest neighbor; Wolf optimization; independent component analysis; random forest; ensemble methods Robust pre-processing capabilities; good for handling imbalanced data; effective feature extraction; better performance through hybrid approaches Limited representation learning; may require extensive feature engineering; performance depends on data quality
Deep learning33,34 1D-CNN; 2D-CNN; hybrid CNN (HCNN); CNN-LSTM; pyramid-structured networks High diagnostic accuracy; strong pattern recognition; good at handling complex data; real-time detection capability Requires extensive preprocessing; limited generalization; high computational demands; limited spatial dependency handling