Skip to main content
. 2025 May 30;12(3):367–381. doi: 10.1007/s40801-025-00492-z

Table 7.

SUS of FDA’s online ADR reporting

Statements Participant’s answer n (%) SUS score
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree M (SD) SUS grade
1. I think I would like to use this tool frequently 2 (0.40) 5 (1.00) 46 (46) 168 (33.67) 278 (55.71) 68.81 (15.52) Okay and grade C
2. I found the tool unnecessarily complex 111 (22.24) 130 (26.05) 125 (25.05) 101 (20.24) 32 (6.41)
3. I thought the tool was easy to use 5 (1.00) 12 (2.40) 117 (23.45 195 (39.08) 170 (34.07)
4. I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this system 104 (20.84) 107 (21.44) 122 (24.45) 99 (19.84) 67 (13.43)
5. I found the various functions in this tool were well integrated 0 (0.00) 6 (1.20) 70 (14.03) 219 (43.89) 204 (40.88
6. I thought there was too much inconsistency in this tool 112 (22.44) 154 (30.86) 140 (28.06) 70 (14.03) 23 (4.61)
7. I would imagine that most people would learn to use this tool very quickly 5 (1.00) 13 (2.61) 94 (18.84) 178 (35.67) 209 (41.88)
8. I found the tool very cumbersome to use 176 (35.27) 167 (33.47) 100 (20.04) 44 (8.82) 12 (2.40)
9. I felt very confident using the tool 4 (0.80) 9 (1.80) 122 (24.45) 185 (37.07) 179 (35.87)
10. I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this tool 56 (11.22) 70 (14.03) 119 (23.85) 151 (30.26) 103 (20.64)

N = 499. SUS score interpretation: > 80.3 (grade A—excellent), 68–80.3 (grade B—Good), 68 (grade C—okay), 51–68 (grade D—poor), and < 51 (grade F—awful)