TABLE 3.

Quality assessment list of all studies.

Study	D1	D2	D3	D4	D5	D6	D7	OverAll
Arikan et al. (2023)	×	-	-	-	+	+	×	×
Cao et al. (2018)	×	-	-	+	+	-	+	×
Hernandez-Melchor et al. (2024)	-	-	+	+	+	-	+	-
Huang et al. (2022)	×	-	+	+	-	-	+	×
Lee et al. (2020)	×	-	+	+	-	-	+	-
Ma et al. (2020)	×	-	+	+	+	-	+	×
Santamaria (2016)	×	-	+	+	+	-	+	×
Zhang et al. (2020)	×	-	+	+	+	-	+	×
Singh et al. (2020)	-	-	+	+	×	-	+	×
Singh et al. (2014)	-	-	+	+	-	+	+	-
Tan et al. (2016)	×	-	+	+	+	-	+	×
Zhu et al. (2024)	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+

D1: Bias due to confounding factors

D2: Bias due to participants' choices

D3: Bias in the classification of interventions

D4: Deviations from intended interventions

D5: Deviation due to missing data

D6: Bias in outcome measurement

D7: Bias in the selection of reporting results

OverAll: The overall risk of bias judgments is determined by the highest risk assigned to any single domain.

+: Low risk of bias

-: Moderate risk of bias

×: High risk of bias