Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1994 Aug;44(385):364–365.

Quality of minor surgery by general practitioners in 1990 and 1991.

A Lowy 1, J Brazier 1, M Fall 1, K Thomas 1, N Jones 1, B T Williams 1
PMCID: PMC1238954  PMID: 8068396

Abstract

BACKGROUND. The 1990 contract for general practitioners encouraged them to undertake minor surgical procedures in their practices. AIM. A study was undertaken to determine whether the subsequent expansion of general practitioner minor surgery activity was accompanied by changes in quality of care. METHOD. Data were analysed relating to minor operations conducted in 22 practices during April-June 1990 and April-June 1991. RESULTS. The volume of general practitioner minor surgery increased by 41% between the two study periods. Waiting time, accuracy of diagnosis, use of histology, adequacy of excision, complications and the need for corrective treatment in hospital did not change significantly between the two periods. CONCLUSION. The findings do not support suggestions that the expansion of general practitioner minor surgery activity following the 1990 contract has been associated with an erosion of quality of care.

Full text

PDF
364

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Godfrey E., Watkiss M., Schnieden H. Initiation and evaluation of a pilot scheme for minor surgery in general practice. Health Trends. 1990;22(2):57–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hillan K. J., Johnson C. P., Morton R. Effect of general practitioner contract on referral of specimens for histological examination. BMJ. 1991 Nov 9;303(6811):1180–1180. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6811.1180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lowy A., Brazier J., Fall M., Thomas K., Jones N., Williams B. T. Minor surgery by general practitioners under the 1990 contract: effects on hospital workload. BMJ. 1993 Aug 14;307(6901):413–417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6901.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McWilliam L. J., Knox F., Wilkinson N., Oogarah P. Performance of skin biopsies by general practitioners. BMJ. 1991 Nov 9;303(6811):1177–1179. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6811.1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. O'Cathain A., Brazier J. E., Milner P. C., Fall M. Cost effectiveness of minor surgery in general practice: a prospective comparison with hospital practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Jan;42(354):13–17. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Williams R. B., Burdge A. H., Jones S. L. Skin biopsy in general practice. BMJ. 1991 Nov 9;303(6811):1179–1180. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6811.1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES